Nigeria’s Shi’a Islamic Movement and Evolving Islamist Threat Landscape: Old, New and Future Generators of Radicalization

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Simon Gray, Ibikunle Adeakin
{"title":"Nigeria’s Shi’a Islamic Movement and Evolving Islamist Threat Landscape: Old, New and Future Generators of Radicalization","authors":"Simon Gray, Ibikunle Adeakin","doi":"10.1080/19392206.2019.1639281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) emerged in the early 1980s as the first Shi’a Islamist organization in Nigeria. However, since the early-2000s this organization has become increasingly confrontational and, at times, violent towards the Nigerian state. Through a qualitative analysis of four key theories concerning the causal dynamics of Islamist radicalization, this article argues that contextual and ideological factors, local and global, generated and radicalized the IMN. These include historical factors, the collapse of the First Republic (1960-1966), military rule, Sunni-Shi’a tensions, the spread and intensification of radical and extremist Islamist ideologies and actors in post-independence Nigeria, and state repression. These factors represent what this study refers to as “old” and “new” generators responsible for the rise and subsequent radicalization of the IMN to date. It concludes with the prognosis that if these generators endure, or worsen, the IMN is likely to undergo a “future”, more violent phase of radicalization that may trigger a full-blown Shi’a insurgency with potential backing from the Iranian regime, in particular via the Quads force and/or Hezbollah.","PeriodicalId":44631,"journal":{"name":"African Security","volume":"12 1","pages":"174 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19392206.2019.1639281","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2019.1639281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) emerged in the early 1980s as the first Shi’a Islamist organization in Nigeria. However, since the early-2000s this organization has become increasingly confrontational and, at times, violent towards the Nigerian state. Through a qualitative analysis of four key theories concerning the causal dynamics of Islamist radicalization, this article argues that contextual and ideological factors, local and global, generated and radicalized the IMN. These include historical factors, the collapse of the First Republic (1960-1966), military rule, Sunni-Shi’a tensions, the spread and intensification of radical and extremist Islamist ideologies and actors in post-independence Nigeria, and state repression. These factors represent what this study refers to as “old” and “new” generators responsible for the rise and subsequent radicalization of the IMN to date. It concludes with the prognosis that if these generators endure, or worsen, the IMN is likely to undergo a “future”, more violent phase of radicalization that may trigger a full-blown Shi’a insurgency with potential backing from the Iranian regime, in particular via the Quads force and/or Hezbollah.
尼日利亚的什叶派伊斯兰运动和不断演变的伊斯兰威胁形势:激进化的新旧和未来成因
摘要尼日利亚伊斯兰运动(IMN)诞生于20世纪80年代初,是尼日利亚第一个什叶派伊斯兰组织。然而,自2000年代初以来,该组织对尼日利亚政府的对抗性越来越强,有时甚至暴力。通过对伊斯兰激进主义因果动力学的四个关键理论的定性分析,本文认为,语境和意识形态因素,即地方和全球因素,产生并激进化了IMN。其中包括历史因素、第一共和国的崩溃(1960-1966)、军事统治、逊尼派和什叶派的紧张局势、独立后尼日利亚激进和极端主义伊斯兰意识形态和行为者的传播和加剧,以及国家镇压。这些因素代表了本研究所称的“旧”和“新”发电机,它们是迄今为止IMN兴起和随后激进化的原因。它得出的结论是,如果这些发电机持续存在或恶化,伊斯兰国阵线很可能会经历一个“未来”、更暴力的激进化阶段,这可能会引发一场全面的什叶派叛乱,并得到伊朗政权的潜在支持,特别是通过Quads部队和/或真主党的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Security
African Security POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信