Freedom to speak up - the role of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office in England.

Henrietta Hughes
{"title":"Freedom to speak up - the role of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office in England.","authors":"Henrietta Hughes","doi":"10.7861/fhj.2019-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the events at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, Sir Robert Francis was commissioned to undertake a public inquiry. During this process, from speaking to NHS workers and from the evidence submitted to the inquiry, he found that staff had tried to speak up about their concerns, but that they had been ignored, or victimised as a result. This experience was not confined to Mid Staffordshire and a further report, <i>Freedom to speak up</i>, was commissioned. <i>Freedom to speak up</i> made two recommendations, which were accepted by all NHS organisations and the Department of Health. The report included principles and actions about the culture and practice in the NHS, the appointment of freedom to speak up guardians in NHS trusts and foundation trusts and a national guardian to lead this network, undertake case reviews and provide support and challenge to the system. In this article, I will describe the work of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office, the impact of these on workers in NHS trusts and other organisations, and the next steps in the journey to make speaking up business as usual.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"186-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the events at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, Sir Robert Francis was commissioned to undertake a public inquiry. During this process, from speaking to NHS workers and from the evidence submitted to the inquiry, he found that staff had tried to speak up about their concerns, but that they had been ignored, or victimised as a result. This experience was not confined to Mid Staffordshire and a further report, Freedom to speak up, was commissioned. Freedom to speak up made two recommendations, which were accepted by all NHS organisations and the Department of Health. The report included principles and actions about the culture and practice in the NHS, the appointment of freedom to speak up guardians in NHS trusts and foundation trusts and a national guardian to lead this network, undertake case reviews and provide support and challenge to the system. In this article, I will describe the work of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office, the impact of these on workers in NHS trusts and other organisations, and the next steps in the journey to make speaking up business as usual.

发声自由——发声自由监护人和英国国家监护人办公室的作用
摘要继斯塔福德郡中部NHS基金会信托基金会的活动之后,Robert Francis爵士受委托进行了一项公开调查。在这个过程中,从与NHS工作人员的交谈和提交给调查的证据来看,他发现工作人员曾试图表达他们的担忧,但他们被忽视了,或者因此而受害。这种经历不仅限于斯塔福德郡中部,还委托编写了另一份报告《畅所欲言的自由》。言论自由提出了两项建议,这些建议被所有NHS组织和卫生部接受。该报告包括关于NHS文化和实践的原则和行动,在NHS信托和基金会信托中任命自由发声的监护人,以及一名国家监护人来领导这个网络,进行案件审查,并为该系统提供支持和挑战。在这篇文章中,我将描述自由发声监护人和国家监护人办公室的工作,这些工作对NHS信托和其他组织的工作人员的影响,以及让发声照常进行的下一步行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信