Enforcing pragmatic future-mindedness cures the innovator's bias

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Andrew Reece, Austin D. Eubanks, Alex Liebscher, Roy F. Baumeister
{"title":"Enforcing pragmatic future-mindedness cures the innovator's bias","authors":"Andrew Reece,&nbsp;Austin D. Eubanks,&nbsp;Alex Liebscher,&nbsp;Roy F. Baumeister","doi":"10.1111/jasp.12956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The innovator's bias is defined as the tendency for innovators to focus mainly on the positive potential impact of their inventions and to neglect, ignore, or downplay any potential negative impact. Such bias may help sustain the motivation needed for business success but may create problems by failing to acknowledge and prepare for problematic outcomes. We report three studies (total <i>n</i> = 1608) designed to demonstrate this bias—and to show how to overcome it (while ideally preserving the innovators' enthusiastic affection for their product). Three studies used hypothetical innovations, all with potential downsides. Feelings of ownership were manipulated by having some participants role-play being marketing manager, including naming the product, devising advertising slogans, and identifying target demographics for potential purchasers. Owners then rated their product, while nonowner controls rated a different product. Study 1 (<i>n</i> = 495) demonstrated the innovator's bias by showing that owners rated the likely consequences of their product more favorably than nonowners did. Owners also displayed more enthusiastic zeal for their product. Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 553) tested interventions aimed at reducing the bias while preserving the zeal. Of six interventions, the most successful was having owners imagine the worst-case scenario involving the most negative outcome that the invention could cause. Study 3 (<i>n</i> = 560) was a preregistered replication of the main findings from Study 2 (osf.io/ew9cq).</p>","PeriodicalId":48404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.12956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The innovator's bias is defined as the tendency for innovators to focus mainly on the positive potential impact of their inventions and to neglect, ignore, or downplay any potential negative impact. Such bias may help sustain the motivation needed for business success but may create problems by failing to acknowledge and prepare for problematic outcomes. We report three studies (total n = 1608) designed to demonstrate this bias—and to show how to overcome it (while ideally preserving the innovators' enthusiastic affection for their product). Three studies used hypothetical innovations, all with potential downsides. Feelings of ownership were manipulated by having some participants role-play being marketing manager, including naming the product, devising advertising slogans, and identifying target demographics for potential purchasers. Owners then rated their product, while nonowner controls rated a different product. Study 1 (n = 495) demonstrated the innovator's bias by showing that owners rated the likely consequences of their product more favorably than nonowners did. Owners also displayed more enthusiastic zeal for their product. Study 2 (n = 553) tested interventions aimed at reducing the bias while preserving the zeal. Of six interventions, the most successful was having owners imagine the worst-case scenario involving the most negative outcome that the invention could cause. Study 3 (n = 560) was a preregistered replication of the main findings from Study 2 (osf.io/ew9cq).

加强务实的未来意识可以治愈创新者的偏见
创新者的偏见被定义为创新者倾向于主要关注其发明的积极潜在影响,而忽视、忽视或淡化任何潜在的负面影响。这种偏见可能有助于维持商业成功所需的动力,但可能会因未能认识到并为有问题的结果做好准备而产生问题。我们报告了三项研究(总共n = 1608),旨在证明这种偏见,并展示如何克服它(同时理想地保持创新者对其产品的热情)。三项研究使用了假设的创新,都有潜在的缺点。通过让一些参与者扮演营销经理的角色,包括命名产品、设计广告口号和确定潜在购买者的目标人口统计数据,他们操纵了所有权的感觉。然后所有者对他们的产品进行评级,而非所有者对不同的产品进行评级。研究1 (n = 495)通过显示所有者比非所有者更积极地评价他们产品的可能后果来证明创新者的偏见。业主们对自己的产品也表现出了更大的热情。研究2 (n = 553)测试了旨在减少偏见同时保持热情的干预措施。在六种干预措施中,最成功的是让所有者想象最坏的情况,包括发明可能导致的最负面的结果。研究3 (n = 560)是研究2 (osf.io/ew9cq)主要研究结果的预注册复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, Journal of Applied Social Psychology is a monthly publication devoted to applications of experimental behavioral science research to problems of society (e.g., organizational and leadership psychology, safety, health, and gender issues; perceptions of war and natural hazards; jury deliberation; performance, AIDS, cancer, heart disease, exercise, and sports).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信