The ethical-normative lack in Brazilian regulation of assisted reproductive techniques: the instrumentalization of human embryos for medical-scientistic knowledge through Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis

IF 0.2 Q4 ETHICS
K. Eler
{"title":"The ethical-normative lack in Brazilian regulation of assisted reproductive techniques: the instrumentalization of human embryos for medical-scientistic knowledge through Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis","authors":"K. Eler","doi":"10.18270/rcb.v13i2.2272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper pursues a better interpretation of the new reproductive technologies by making a counterpoint to the scientistic bias of bills being processed in the country that excels in defending the interests of professionals, especially in clinics and laboratories, disregarding the new person generated. The social and scientific relevance of the subject is to reflect on the necessity of attention and caution in the implementation of the new technologies for breeding. Today, technological advancement is closely tied to the means of acquiring power and lacks evaluative constructs. There is a risk of disrespecting constitutional rights. The primary objective of this research is to seek a new valuation of human, social and juristic scientific and technological innovations in the field of assisted reproduction. To attain this end, we will adopt the content analysis methodology, taking as theoretical framework the concept of person developed by Robert Spaemann.","PeriodicalId":40826,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Bioetica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v13i2.2272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper pursues a better interpretation of the new reproductive technologies by making a counterpoint to the scientistic bias of bills being processed in the country that excels in defending the interests of professionals, especially in clinics and laboratories, disregarding the new person generated. The social and scientific relevance of the subject is to reflect on the necessity of attention and caution in the implementation of the new technologies for breeding. Today, technological advancement is closely tied to the means of acquiring power and lacks evaluative constructs. There is a risk of disrespecting constitutional rights. The primary objective of this research is to seek a new valuation of human, social and juristic scientific and technological innovations in the field of assisted reproduction. To attain this end, we will adopt the content analysis methodology, taking as theoretical framework the concept of person developed by Robert Spaemann.
巴西对辅助生殖技术的监管缺乏伦理规范:通过植入前遗传学诊断将人类胚胎工具化以获得医学科学知识
本文试图更好地解释新的生殖技术,与该国正在处理的法案的科学主义偏见形成对比,该国擅长捍卫专业人员的利益,尤其是在诊所和实验室,无视新产生的人。该主题的社会和科学相关性是反思在实施育种新技术时需要注意和谨慎。今天,技术进步与获取权力的手段密切相关,缺乏评价结构。存在着不尊重宪法权利的风险。本研究的主要目的是寻求对辅助生殖领域的人类、社会和法律科学技术创新的新评价。为此,我们将采用内容分析法,以罗伯特·斯帕曼提出的人的概念为理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信