Summer sea ice floe perimeter density in the Arctic: high-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Cryosphere Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.5194/tc-17-3575-2023
Yanan Wang, B. Hwang, A. Bateson, Y. Aksenov, C. Horvat
{"title":"Summer sea ice floe perimeter density in the Arctic: high-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation","authors":"Yanan Wang, B. Hwang, A. Bateson, Y. Aksenov, C. Horvat","doi":"10.5194/tc-17-3575-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Size distribution of sea ice floes is an important\ncomponent for sea ice thermodynamic and dynamic processes, particularly in\nthe marginal ice zone. Recently processes related to the floe size\ndistribution (FSD) have been incorporated into sea ice models, but the\nsparsity of existing observations limits the evaluation of FSD models, thus\nhindering model improvements. In this study, perimeter density has been\napplied to characterise the floe size distribution for evaluating three FSD\nmodels – the Waves-in-Ice module and Power law Floe Size Distribution (WIPoFSD)\nmodel and two branches of a fully prognostic floe size-thickness\ndistribution model: CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE. These models are evaluated\nagainst a new FSD dataset derived from high-resolution satellite imagery in\nthe Arctic. The evaluation shows an overall overestimation of floe perimeter\ndensity by the models against the observations. Comparison of the floe\nperimeter density distribution with the observations shows that the models\nexhibit a much larger proportion for small floes (radius <10–30 m) but a much smaller proportion for large floes (radius >30–50 m). Observations and the WIPoFSD model both show a negative\ncorrelation between sea ice concentration and the floe perimeter density,\nbut the two prognostic models (CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE) show the opposite\npattern. These differences between models and the observations may be\nattributed to limitations in the observations (e.g. the image resolution is\nnot sufficient to detect small floes) or limitations in the model\nparameterisations, including the use of a global power-law exponent in the\nWIPoFSD model as well as too weak a floe welding and enhanced wave fracture\nin the prognostic models.\n","PeriodicalId":56315,"journal":{"name":"Cryosphere","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cryosphere","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3575-2023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Size distribution of sea ice floes is an important component for sea ice thermodynamic and dynamic processes, particularly in the marginal ice zone. Recently processes related to the floe size distribution (FSD) have been incorporated into sea ice models, but the sparsity of existing observations limits the evaluation of FSD models, thus hindering model improvements. In this study, perimeter density has been applied to characterise the floe size distribution for evaluating three FSD models – the Waves-in-Ice module and Power law Floe Size Distribution (WIPoFSD) model and two branches of a fully prognostic floe size-thickness distribution model: CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE. These models are evaluated against a new FSD dataset derived from high-resolution satellite imagery in the Arctic. The evaluation shows an overall overestimation of floe perimeter density by the models against the observations. Comparison of the floe perimeter density distribution with the observations shows that the models exhibit a much larger proportion for small floes (radius <10–30 m) but a much smaller proportion for large floes (radius >30–50 m). Observations and the WIPoFSD model both show a negative correlation between sea ice concentration and the floe perimeter density, but the two prognostic models (CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE) show the opposite pattern. These differences between models and the observations may be attributed to limitations in the observations (e.g. the image resolution is not sufficient to detect small floes) or limitations in the model parameterisations, including the use of a global power-law exponent in the WIPoFSD model as well as too weak a floe welding and enhanced wave fracture in the prognostic models.
北极夏季海冰周长密度:高分辨率光学卫星图像和模式评估
摘要浮冰的大小分布是海冰热力学和动力学过程的重要组成部分,尤其是在边缘冰区。最近,与浮冰尺寸分布(FSD)相关的过程已被纳入海冰模型,但现有观测结果的稀疏性限制了对FSD模型的评估,从而导致了模型的改进。在这项研究中,周长密度被用于表征浮冰尺寸分布,以评估三个FSD模型——冰中波浪模块和幂律浮冰尺寸分配(WIPoFSD)模型,以及完全预测浮冰尺寸厚度分布模型的两个分支:CPOM-FSD和FSDv2 WAVE。这些模型是根据一个新的FSD数据集进行评估的,该数据集来自北极的高分辨率卫星图像。评估显示,模型对浮冰周边密度的总体高估与观测结果相反。浮子密度分布与观测结果的比较表明,该模型对小浮子(半径 30–50 m) 。观测结果和WIPoFSD模型均显示海冰浓度与浮冰周长密度呈负相关,但两个预测模型(CPOM-FSD和FSDv2 WAVE)显示相反的趋势。模型和观测结果之间的这些差异可能是由于观测结果的局限性(例如,图像分辨率不足以检测小浮冰)或模型参数的局限性,包括在WIPoFSD模型中使用全局幂律指数,以及预测模型中浮冰焊接太弱和波浪破裂增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cryosphere
Cryosphere GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.30%
发文量
240
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cryosphere (TC) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of frozen water and ground on Earth and on other planetary bodies. The main subject areas are the following: ice sheets and glaciers; planetary ice bodies; permafrost and seasonally frozen ground; seasonal snow cover; sea ice; river and lake ice; remote sensing, numerical modelling, in situ and laboratory studies of the above and including studies of the interaction of the cryosphere with the rest of the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信