An international study to explore the feasibility of collecting standardised outcome data for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: recommendations for an international clinical research registry.

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1177/20494637231188333
Sharon Grieve, Florian Brunner, Danylo F Cabral, Robyn Connett, Hitoshi Hirata, Norimasa Iwasaki, Yasunobu Nakagawa, Afrin Sagir, Gudson Sousa, Jean-Jacques Vatine, Nicole Vaughan-Spickers, Jijun Xu, Lisa Buckle, Candida McCabe
{"title":"An international study to explore the feasibility of collecting standardised outcome data for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: recommendations for an international clinical research registry.","authors":"Sharon Grieve, Florian Brunner, Danylo F Cabral, Robyn Connett, Hitoshi Hirata, Norimasa Iwasaki, Yasunobu Nakagawa, Afrin Sagir, Gudson Sousa, Jean-Jacques Vatine, Nicole Vaughan-Spickers, Jijun Xu, Lisa Buckle, Candida McCabe","doi":"10.1177/20494637231188333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a persistent pain condition with low prevalence. Multi-centre collaborative research is needed to attain sufficient sample sizes for meaningful studies. This international observational study: (1) tested the feasibility and acceptability of collecting outcome data using an agreed core measurement set (2) tested and refined an electronic data management system to collect and manage the data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with CRPS, meeting the Budapest diagnostic clinical criteria, were recruited to the study from 7 international research centres. After informed consent, a questionnaire comprising the core set outcome measures was completed: on paper at baseline (T1), and at 3 or 6 months (T2) using a paper or e-version. Participants and clinicians provided feedback on the data collection process. Clinicians completed the CRPS severity score at T1 and optionally, at T2. Ethical approval was obtained at each international centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight adults were recruited (female n=66; mean age 46.6 years, range 19-89), of whom 32% chose to receive the T2 questionnaire in an electronic format. Fifty-five participants completed both T1 and T2. Eighteen participants and nine clinicians provided feedback on their data collection experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed the questionnaire core outcome data are feasible and practicable to collect in clinical practice. The electronic data management system provided a robust means of collecting and managing the data across an international population. The findings have informed the final data collection tools and processes which will comprise the first international, clinical research registry and data bank for CRPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"17 1","pages":"468-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10722111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231188333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a persistent pain condition with low prevalence. Multi-centre collaborative research is needed to attain sufficient sample sizes for meaningful studies. This international observational study: (1) tested the feasibility and acceptability of collecting outcome data using an agreed core measurement set (2) tested and refined an electronic data management system to collect and manage the data.

Methods: Adults with CRPS, meeting the Budapest diagnostic clinical criteria, were recruited to the study from 7 international research centres. After informed consent, a questionnaire comprising the core set outcome measures was completed: on paper at baseline (T1), and at 3 or 6 months (T2) using a paper or e-version. Participants and clinicians provided feedback on the data collection process. Clinicians completed the CRPS severity score at T1 and optionally, at T2. Ethical approval was obtained at each international centre.

Results: Ninety-eight adults were recruited (female n=66; mean age 46.6 years, range 19-89), of whom 32% chose to receive the T2 questionnaire in an electronic format. Fifty-five participants completed both T1 and T2. Eighteen participants and nine clinicians provided feedback on their data collection experience.

Conclusion: This study confirmed the questionnaire core outcome data are feasible and practicable to collect in clinical practice. The electronic data management system provided a robust means of collecting and managing the data across an international population. The findings have informed the final data collection tools and processes which will comprise the first international, clinical research registry and data bank for CRPS.

一项探讨收集复杂区域性疼痛综合征标准化结果数据的可行性的国际研究:对国际临床研究注册的建议
引言复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种持续性疼痛,发病率较低。需要多中心合作研究,以获得足够的样本量进行有意义的研究。这项国际观察性研究:(1)测试了使用商定的核心测量集收集结果数据的可行性和可接受性(2)测试并完善了收集和管理数据的电子数据管理系统。方法从7个国际研究中心招募符合布达佩斯诊断临床标准的CRPS成人进行研究。知情同意后,完成了一份包括核心结果指标的问卷:在基线时(T1)在纸上,在3或6个月时(T2)使用纸质版或电子版。参与者和临床医生对数据收集过程提供了反馈。临床医生在T1和T2完成CRPS严重程度评分。每个国际中心都获得了伦理批准。结果招募了98名成年人(女性n=66;平均年龄46.6岁,范围19-89岁),其中32%的人选择接受电子形式的T2问卷。五十五名参与者同时完成了T1和T2。18名参与者和9名临床医生就他们的数据收集经验提供了反馈。结论本研究证实了问卷核心结果数据在临床实践中的收集是可行和可行的。电子数据管理系统为收集和管理国际人口的数据提供了强有力的手段。这些发现为最终的数据收集工具和过程提供了信息,这些工具和过程将包括CRPS的第一个国际临床研究登记和数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信