Regionalized environmental damages and life cycle cost of chickpea production using LC-IMPACT assessment

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Anders Damgaard
{"title":"Regionalized environmental damages and life cycle cost of chickpea production using LC-IMPACT assessment","authors":"Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei,&nbsp;Anders Damgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Modern intensive agriculture worldwide is generating increasing environmental and economic pressures that hinder its sustainable development. This study proposes the joint use </span>life cycle assessment<span> (LCA) and life cycle costing<span> (LCC) to evaluate irrigated chickpea production (ICP) and the eco-environmental situation of dry farming (DFCP). Data are collected from 625 chickpea farmers in in the Kermanshah province of Iran. The most updated approach, LC-IMPACT, is applied for the first time globally in agricultural activity LCA. Results indicate that most impact categories of ICP have higher rates than DFCP. On-Field emissions and pesticides in DFCP, and nitrogen and phosphate in ICP, are identified as the main hotspots. The LCC analysis reveals that the total emissions cost (EC) for DFCP and ICP is 130 and 53 $ per one tone of chickpea (1TCP</span></span></span><sup>−1</sup>), respectively. Additionally, the LCC for DFCP and ICP is computed as 837 and 666 $ 1TCP<sup>−1</sup>. The eco-efficiency rate of damage categories in DFCP shows a better situation compared to the ICP scenario. The findings indicate that the DFCP scenario exhibits a higher level of environmental friendliness compared to the ICP scenario. Finally, it can be concluded that the joint use of LC-IMPACT assessment method and LCC can contribute to achieving better eco-environmental conditions in chickpea production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 107259"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925523002251","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Modern intensive agriculture worldwide is generating increasing environmental and economic pressures that hinder its sustainable development. This study proposes the joint use life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) to evaluate irrigated chickpea production (ICP) and the eco-environmental situation of dry farming (DFCP). Data are collected from 625 chickpea farmers in in the Kermanshah province of Iran. The most updated approach, LC-IMPACT, is applied for the first time globally in agricultural activity LCA. Results indicate that most impact categories of ICP have higher rates than DFCP. On-Field emissions and pesticides in DFCP, and nitrogen and phosphate in ICP, are identified as the main hotspots. The LCC analysis reveals that the total emissions cost (EC) for DFCP and ICP is 130 and 53 $ per one tone of chickpea (1TCP−1), respectively. Additionally, the LCC for DFCP and ICP is computed as 837 and 666 $ 1TCP−1. The eco-efficiency rate of damage categories in DFCP shows a better situation compared to the ICP scenario. The findings indicate that the DFCP scenario exhibits a higher level of environmental friendliness compared to the ICP scenario. Finally, it can be concluded that the joint use of LC-IMPACT assessment method and LCC can contribute to achieving better eco-environmental conditions in chickpea production.

Abstract Image

基于LC-IMPACT评价的鹰嘴豆生产区域环境损害及生命周期成本
世界范围内的现代集约化农业正在产生越来越大的环境和经济压力,阻碍其可持续发展。本研究提出联合利用生命周期评价(LCA)和生命周期成本(LCC)来评价鹰嘴豆灌溉生产(ICP)和旱作农业生态环境状况(DFCP)。数据收集自伊朗克尔曼沙阿省625名鹰嘴豆农民。最新方法LC-IMPACT首次在全球范围内应用于农业活动LCA。结果表明,大多数影响类别的ICP的发生率高于DFCP。DFCP的现场排放和农药、ICP的氮和磷酸盐是主要热点。LCC分析显示,DFCP和ICP的总排放成本(EC)分别为每吨鹰嘴豆130美元和53美元(1TCP−1)。此外,DFCP和ICP的LCC分别为837和666 $ 1TCP−1。与ICP方案相比,DFCP方案中各损害类别的生态效率有所提高。研究结果表明,与ICP方案相比,DFCP方案表现出更高水平的环境友好性。综上所述,综合运用LC-IMPACT评价方法和LCC方法可以为鹰嘴豆生产创造更好的生态环境条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信