To Evaluate the Correlation between Intracranial Pressure and Intraocular Pressure in Neurological Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Garg Pragati, Diwedi Smriti, M. Ritika
{"title":"To Evaluate the Correlation between Intracranial Pressure and Intraocular Pressure in Neurological Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Garg Pragati, Diwedi Smriti, M. Ritika","doi":"10.23937/2378-346X/1410104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anatomical proximation of eye with the intracranial space indicates potential relation between cerebrospinal fluid pressure and intraocular pressure. Aims: Based on their similarity and apparent relationship, non-invasive measurement of intraocular pressure might substitute for lumbar puncture for measuring cerebrospinal fluid pressure in near future. Settings and design: Hospital based prospective cohort study. Methods and material: 120 patients after their informed consent and approval by institutional ethical committee. All patients who were above 18 years; could give consent and who underwent lumber puncture for any neurological symptom or diagnostic reasons and intraocular pressure was measured using Schiotz tonometer, were eligible for this study. Statistical analysis used: Chi square test between ordinal (intraocular pressure) and categorical (intracranial pressure) values, and linear regression for ordinal (both intraocular pressure and intracranial pressure) values. Results: 68.5% (89/120) of patients had normal intracranial pressure between 5 and 15 mmhg, while 29.2% (38/120) of patients had elevated intracranial pressure of more than 15 mmhg. regarding mean intraocular pressure values, 6.9% (9/120) of patients had lower intraocular pressure, less than 10 mmhg: 90.8% (118/120) of patients with normal intraocular pressure between 10 and 21 mmhg, the other 2.3% (3/120) of patients with higher intraocular pressure more than 21 mmhg. our results showed that intracranial pressure was significantly and positively correlated with intraocular pressure intracranial pressure was correlated significantly with intraocular pressure of the right eyes and intraocular pressure of the left eyes and mean intraocular pressure (MIOP) of both eyes. Conclusions: The findings in our study are statistically significant suggest that the elevated intracranial pressure may have acted as a counter pressure across the lamina cribrosa to compensate for the elevated intraocular pressure. This correlation is helpful in proving that intraocular pressure can replace invasive modalities for intracranial pressure in the near future.","PeriodicalId":91712,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-346X/1410104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anatomical proximation of eye with the intracranial space indicates potential relation between cerebrospinal fluid pressure and intraocular pressure. Aims: Based on their similarity and apparent relationship, non-invasive measurement of intraocular pressure might substitute for lumbar puncture for measuring cerebrospinal fluid pressure in near future. Settings and design: Hospital based prospective cohort study. Methods and material: 120 patients after their informed consent and approval by institutional ethical committee. All patients who were above 18 years; could give consent and who underwent lumber puncture for any neurological symptom or diagnostic reasons and intraocular pressure was measured using Schiotz tonometer, were eligible for this study. Statistical analysis used: Chi square test between ordinal (intraocular pressure) and categorical (intracranial pressure) values, and linear regression for ordinal (both intraocular pressure and intracranial pressure) values. Results: 68.5% (89/120) of patients had normal intracranial pressure between 5 and 15 mmhg, while 29.2% (38/120) of patients had elevated intracranial pressure of more than 15 mmhg. regarding mean intraocular pressure values, 6.9% (9/120) of patients had lower intraocular pressure, less than 10 mmhg: 90.8% (118/120) of patients with normal intraocular pressure between 10 and 21 mmhg, the other 2.3% (3/120) of patients with higher intraocular pressure more than 21 mmhg. our results showed that intracranial pressure was significantly and positively correlated with intraocular pressure intracranial pressure was correlated significantly with intraocular pressure of the right eyes and intraocular pressure of the left eyes and mean intraocular pressure (MIOP) of both eyes. Conclusions: The findings in our study are statistically significant suggest that the elevated intracranial pressure may have acted as a counter pressure across the lamina cribrosa to compensate for the elevated intraocular pressure. This correlation is helpful in proving that intraocular pressure can replace invasive modalities for intracranial pressure in the near future.
评估神经系统患者颅内压和眼压之间的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究
背景:眼与颅内间隙的解剖接近提示脑脊液压与眼压之间的潜在关系。目的:基于两者的相似性和明显的相关性,无创眼压测量可能在不久的将来取代腰椎穿刺测量脑脊液压。环境和设计:基于医院的前瞻性队列研究。方法和材料:120例患者经其知情同意并经机构伦理委员会批准。所有患者年龄在18岁以上;同意,因任何神经症状或诊断原因行腰椎穿刺,并使用Schiotz眼压计测量眼压,均符合本研究的条件。统计分析:序贯值(眼压)与分类值(颅内压)之间采用卡方检验,序贯值(眼压和颅内压)采用线性回归。结果:68.5%(89/120)的患者颅内压在5 ~ 15mmhg之间,29.2%(38/120)的患者颅内压升高超过15mmhg。平均眼压值方面,6.9%(9/120)的患者眼压较低,小于10mmhg;正常眼压在10 ~ 21mmhg之间的患者占90.8%(118/120),高于21mmhg的患者占2.3%(3/120)。结果显示,颅内压与眼内压呈显著正相关。颅内压与右眼眼压、左眼眼压及双眼平均眼压(MIOP)呈显著正相关。结论:我们的研究结果具有统计学意义,表明颅内压升高可能起到了通过筛板的反压作用,以补偿眼压升高。这种相关性有助于证明眼压在不久的将来可以取代侵入性颅内压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信