E. Dowdy, M. Furlong, Karen Nylund-Gibson, Dina A N Arch, T. Hinton, D. Carter
{"title":"Validating a Brief Student Distress Measure For Schoolwide Wellness Surveillance","authors":"E. Dowdy, M. Furlong, Karen Nylund-Gibson, Dina A N Arch, T. Hinton, D. Carter","doi":"10.1177/15345084221138947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The original Social Emotional Distress Survey–Secondary (SEDS-S) assesses adolescents’ past month’s experiences of psychological distress. Given the continued need for and use of brief measures of student social-emotional distress, this study examined a five-item version (SEDS-S-Brief) to evaluate its use for surveillance of adolescents’ wellness in schools. Three samples completed the SEDS-S-Brief. Sample 1 was a cross-sectional sample of 105,771 students from 113 California secondary schools; responses were used to examine validity evidence based on internal structure. Sample 2 consisted of 10,770 secondary students who also completed the Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary-2020, Mental Health Continuum–Short Form, Multidimensional Student Life Satisfaction Scale, and selected Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance items (chronic sadness and suicidal ideation). Sample 2 responses examined validity evidence based on relations to other variables. Sample 3 consisted of 773 secondary students who completed the SEDS-S-Brief annually for 3 years, providing response stability coefficients. The SEDS-S-Brief was invariant across students based on sex, grade level, and Latinx status, supporting its use across diverse groups in schools. Additional analyses indicated moderate to strong convergent and discriminant validity characteristics and 1- and 2-year temporal stability. The findings advance the field toward comprehensive mental health surveillance practices to inform services for youth in schools.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":"48 1","pages":"159 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084221138947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The original Social Emotional Distress Survey–Secondary (SEDS-S) assesses adolescents’ past month’s experiences of psychological distress. Given the continued need for and use of brief measures of student social-emotional distress, this study examined a five-item version (SEDS-S-Brief) to evaluate its use for surveillance of adolescents’ wellness in schools. Three samples completed the SEDS-S-Brief. Sample 1 was a cross-sectional sample of 105,771 students from 113 California secondary schools; responses were used to examine validity evidence based on internal structure. Sample 2 consisted of 10,770 secondary students who also completed the Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary-2020, Mental Health Continuum–Short Form, Multidimensional Student Life Satisfaction Scale, and selected Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance items (chronic sadness and suicidal ideation). Sample 2 responses examined validity evidence based on relations to other variables. Sample 3 consisted of 773 secondary students who completed the SEDS-S-Brief annually for 3 years, providing response stability coefficients. The SEDS-S-Brief was invariant across students based on sex, grade level, and Latinx status, supporting its use across diverse groups in schools. Additional analyses indicated moderate to strong convergent and discriminant validity characteristics and 1- and 2-year temporal stability. The findings advance the field toward comprehensive mental health surveillance practices to inform services for youth in schools.
最初的社会情绪困扰调查-二级(SEDS-S)评估青少年过去一个月的心理困扰经历。鉴于对学生社会情绪困扰的简短测量的持续需求和使用,本研究检验了一个五项版本(SEDS-S-Brief)来评估其在学校青少年健康监测中的应用。三个样本完成了SEDS-S-Brief。样本1是来自113所加州中学的105771名学生的横截面样本;回应被用来检验基于内部结构的效度证据。样本2由10770名中学生组成,他们还完成了《社会情绪健康调查-中学-2020》、《心理健康连续简表》、《多维学生生活满意度量表》和选定的青少年危险行为监测项目(慢性悲伤和自杀意念)。样本2的回答基于与其他变量的关系来检验有效性证据。样本3由773名中学生组成,他们连续3年每年完成sds - s - brief,提供响应稳定性系数。SEDS-S-Brief在性别、年级水平和拉丁裔学生中是不变的,支持在学校不同群体中使用。额外的分析表明,中度到强的收敛和判别效度特征和1年和2年的时间稳定性。研究结果推动了该领域全面的心理健康监测实践,为学校青少年服务提供信息。