Erika T. Allred, Clarkson R. Crane, Elizabeth G. Ingulli
{"title":"Three-month protocol biopsies do not detect subclinical rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at a single center","authors":"Erika T. Allred, Clarkson R. Crane, Elizabeth G. Ingulli","doi":"10.1016/j.tpr.2021.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Background Subacute allograft rejection (SAR) results in chronic allograft nephropathy and decreased allograft survival. Protocol biopsies (PB) are performed in many top centers to identify SAR. Our study aimed to evaluate the rate of SAR detected in PB at our single center. Methods Retrospective review of 38 pediatric patients (pts) who received a kidney allograft from April 2014 through January 2018. Induction immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab (<em>n</em> = 25). High risk pts received antithymocyte globulin (<em>n</em> = 13). Tacrolimus-based triple drug maintenance immunosuppression was used. PBs were performed 3–6 months after transplant. Pathology was evaluated by trained pathologists and classified using Banff criteria. Results Thirty-eight pts were included. Five pts underwent biopsy before 3 months due to elevated creatinine or BK viremia. Thirty-three pts underwent PB 12–23 weeks after transplant. Six pts had elevated creatinine at the time of PB; only 1/6 biopsies showed acute rejection. Of the remaining 27 PBs, only 1/27 showed acute rejection. The total rejection rate at 6 months post-transplant was 5.26%, with a SAR rate of 3.7%. Conclusions These findings do not substantiate early PB at our institution. Our study suggests that perhaps later time points for PB when immunosuppressive meds are at their lowest levels or use of novel biomarkers as an initial screen for biopsy in patients at risk for SAR would be more informative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37786,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tpr.2021.100082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245195962100010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Subacute allograft rejection (SAR) results in chronic allograft nephropathy and decreased allograft survival. Protocol biopsies (PB) are performed in many top centers to identify SAR. Our study aimed to evaluate the rate of SAR detected in PB at our single center. Methods Retrospective review of 38 pediatric patients (pts) who received a kidney allograft from April 2014 through January 2018. Induction immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab (n = 25). High risk pts received antithymocyte globulin (n = 13). Tacrolimus-based triple drug maintenance immunosuppression was used. PBs were performed 3–6 months after transplant. Pathology was evaluated by trained pathologists and classified using Banff criteria. Results Thirty-eight pts were included. Five pts underwent biopsy before 3 months due to elevated creatinine or BK viremia. Thirty-three pts underwent PB 12–23 weeks after transplant. Six pts had elevated creatinine at the time of PB; only 1/6 biopsies showed acute rejection. Of the remaining 27 PBs, only 1/27 showed acute rejection. The total rejection rate at 6 months post-transplant was 5.26%, with a SAR rate of 3.7%. Conclusions These findings do not substantiate early PB at our institution. Our study suggests that perhaps later time points for PB when immunosuppressive meds are at their lowest levels or use of novel biomarkers as an initial screen for biopsy in patients at risk for SAR would be more informative.
期刊介绍:
To provide to national and regional audiences experiences unique to them or confirming of broader concepts originating in large controlled trials. All aspects of organ, tissue and cell transplantation clinically and experimentally. Transplantation Reports will provide in-depth representation of emerging preclinical, impactful and clinical experiences. -Original basic or clinical science articles that represent initial limited experiences as preliminary reports. -Clinical trials of therapies previously well documented in large trials but now tested in limited, special, ethnic or clinically unique patient populations. -Case studies that confirm prior reports but have occurred in patients displaying unique clinical characteristics such as ethnicities or rarely associated co-morbidities. Transplantation Reports offers these benefits: -Fast and fair peer review -Rapid, article-based publication -Unrivalled visibility and exposure for your research -Immediate, free and permanent access to your paper on Science Direct -Immediately citable using the article DOI