An examination of division I athletic-academic support services facilities and staffing

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/19357397.2018.1525140

L. Judge, J. Petersen, James E. Johnson, D. Bellar, B. Leitzelar, D. Zupin, Nick Nordmann, C. R. Rode

{"title":"An examination of division I athletic-academic support services facilities and staffing","authors":"L. Judge, J. Petersen, James E. Johnson, D. Bellar, B. Leitzelar, D. Zupin, Nick Nordmann, C. R. Rode","doi":"10.1080/19357397.2018.1525140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined athlete academic support services in NCAA Division I schools across three broad areas: 1) program scope and budget, 2) program leadership and staffing, and 3) program facilities and equipment. A secondary purpose was to examine differences in these programs and facilities based upon football status amongst three categories including Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), Football Championship Subdivision (FCS), and non-football Division I schools (NFS). A 48-item survey was developed with expert input to explore academic support programs and facilities. A total of 100 academic support program directors completed the online survey, including 29 FBS, 36 FCS, and 35 NFS institutions dispersed among 31 athletic conferences. Descriptive data for the Division I schools for 21 key variables were determined for the whole sample. Additional ANOVA results identified 18 areas of significant difference based upon football classification regarding athletic-academic support facilities and their leadership, staffing, budget, and facilities.","PeriodicalId":56347,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"220 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19357397.2018.1525140","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2018.1525140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examined athlete academic support services in NCAA Division I schools across three broad areas: 1) program scope and budget, 2) program leadership and staffing, and 3) program facilities and equipment. A secondary purpose was to examine differences in these programs and facilities based upon football status amongst three categories including Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), Football Championship Subdivision (FCS), and non-football Division I schools (NFS). A 48-item survey was developed with expert input to explore academic support programs and facilities. A total of 100 academic support program directors completed the online survey, including 29 FBS, 36 FCS, and 35 NFS institutions dispersed among 31 athletic conferences. Descriptive data for the Division I schools for 21 key variables were determined for the whole sample. Additional ANOVA results identified 18 areas of significant difference based upon football classification regarding athletic-academic support facilities and their leadership, staffing, budget, and facilities.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一科体育学术支持服务设施和人员配置的审查

本研究从三个方面考察了NCAA一级学校的运动员学术支持服务:1)项目范围和预算，2)项目领导和人员配备，以及3)项目设施和设备。第二个目的是检查这些项目和设施的差异，这些项目和设施是基于三种类型的足球状态，包括足球碗分区(FBS)，足球锦标赛分区(FCS)和非足球I区学校(NFS)。一项包含48个项目的调查得到了专家的意见，以探索学术支持计划和设施。共有100名学术支持项目主任完成了在线调查，其中包括29个FBS, 36个FCS和35个NFS机构，分布在31个体育会议中。为整个样本确定了21个关键变量的第一类学校的描述性数据。另外的方差分析结果确定了18个领域的显著差异基于足球分类关于运动-学术支持设施及其领导，人员配置，预算和设施。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

自引率

0.00%

发文量