Smearing time: Critical temporality and corporate ontology

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
G. Genosko, P. Hegarty
{"title":"Smearing time: Critical temporality and corporate ontology","authors":"G. Genosko, P. Hegarty","doi":"10.1177/0961463X20933479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1972 a leap second has been introduced into global time standardization systems, due to the discrepancy between Coordinated Universal Time and International Atomic Time. Until recently, the leap second has been a consensual, if mildly uncanny adjustment, a para-governmental temporal wobble. Google's explanation of its actions with regard to the insertion of a leap second smeared into its Network Time Protocol servers is couched in terms of a period extending initially over 20 h, ultimately reaching 24 h. Google is intent on taking ownership of the smear and transducing it into a technologically stabilised change. Although there are a number of different strategies of smearing time, Google advocates for its standard smear that it wants other digital giants like Bloomberg, Amazon and Microsoft to replicate. In this paper we first analyze Google's temporal strategy in terms of its affinities and departures from the classical view of time in Aristotle's core considerations in the Physics Book IV, in terms of a consonant enumeration but in our example at variable speeds/intervals, and then in terms of Wolfgang Ernst's conception of time-critical media. Leap seconds conform to Ernst's sense of kairotic time, an auspicious micro-moment that is both techno-mathematically pre-defined and decisive for ensuring operationality. Google executes smeared time-critical processes but wants to establish mastery over the measurement and manipulation of humanly imperceptible microtemporal events by inhabiting temporal ontology itself, proposing its practice, based on misleading its servers, as a model for other digital hegemons.","PeriodicalId":47347,"journal":{"name":"Time & Society","volume":"29 1","pages":"1009 - 1023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0961463X20933479","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20933479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1972 a leap second has been introduced into global time standardization systems, due to the discrepancy between Coordinated Universal Time and International Atomic Time. Until recently, the leap second has been a consensual, if mildly uncanny adjustment, a para-governmental temporal wobble. Google's explanation of its actions with regard to the insertion of a leap second smeared into its Network Time Protocol servers is couched in terms of a period extending initially over 20 h, ultimately reaching 24 h. Google is intent on taking ownership of the smear and transducing it into a technologically stabilised change. Although there are a number of different strategies of smearing time, Google advocates for its standard smear that it wants other digital giants like Bloomberg, Amazon and Microsoft to replicate. In this paper we first analyze Google's temporal strategy in terms of its affinities and departures from the classical view of time in Aristotle's core considerations in the Physics Book IV, in terms of a consonant enumeration but in our example at variable speeds/intervals, and then in terms of Wolfgang Ernst's conception of time-critical media. Leap seconds conform to Ernst's sense of kairotic time, an auspicious micro-moment that is both techno-mathematically pre-defined and decisive for ensuring operationality. Google executes smeared time-critical processes but wants to establish mastery over the measurement and manipulation of humanly imperceptible microtemporal events by inhabiting temporal ontology itself, proposing its practice, based on misleading its servers, as a model for other digital hegemons.
涂抹时间:关键时间性和企业本体
自1972年以来,由于协调世界时和国际原子时之间的差异,闰秒被引入了全球时间标准化系统。直到最近,闰秒一直是一种共识,尽管有点不可思议,但却是一种准政府的时间波动。谷歌对其在网络时间协议服务器中插入闰秒诽谤的行为的解释是,最初的时间超过20小时,最终达到24小时。谷歌打算接管诽谤的所有权,并将其转化为技术稳定的变革。尽管有很多不同的抹黑时间的策略,但谷歌提倡其标准抹黑,希望彭博社、亚马逊和微软等其他数字巨头也能效仿。在本文中,我们首先分析了谷歌的时间策略,从其与亚里士多德在《物理》第四卷中的核心考虑中的经典时间观的接近和偏离,从辅音列举的角度,但在我们的例子中是可变速度/间隔的,然后从Wolfgang Ernst的时间批判媒体概念的角度。闰秒符合Ernst的时间感,这是一个吉祥的微观时刻,在技术和数学上都是预先定义的,对确保操作性具有决定性意义。谷歌执行模糊的时间关键过程,但希望通过栖息在时间本体本身,建立对人类难以察觉的微观时间事件的测量和操纵的掌握,并在误导其服务器的基础上提出其实践,作为其他数字霸主的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Time & Society
Time & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Time & Society publishes articles, reviews, and scholarly comment discussing the workings of time and temporality across a range of disciplines, including anthropology, geography, history, psychology, and sociology. Work focuses on methodological and theoretical problems, including the use of time in organizational contexts. You"ll also find critiques of and proposals for time-related changes in the formation of public, social, economic, and organizational policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信