Library Staff Morale Correlates with Having a Sense of Respect and Value for Their Work, Relationship to Direct Supervisors and Colleagues, and Autonomy and Flexibility in Their Work Environments

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Eugenia Opuda
{"title":"Library Staff Morale Correlates with Having a Sense of Respect and Value for Their Work, Relationship to Direct Supervisors and Colleagues, and Autonomy and Flexibility in Their Work Environments","authors":"Eugenia Opuda","doi":"10.18438/eblip30240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of:Glusker, A., Emmelhainz, C., Estrada, N., & Dyess, B. (2022). “Viewed as equals”: The impacts of library organizational cultures and management on library staff morale. Journal of Library Administration, 62(2), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2026119\nObjective – To explore what library organizational factors influence library staff morale.\nDesign – Semi-structured interview, grounded theory.\nSetting – Academic libraries across the United States during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.\nSubjects – 34 academic library staff, defined by the authors as employees whose positions do not require an MLIS degree and do not include the title “librarian”, from 23 private and public colleges and universities across 16 states, mostly representative of the West and Midwest regions.\nMethods – In 2020, the authors emailed a call for study participants to library listservs and state library associations across the US, selected a convenience sample of 34 library staff from academic institutions, and conducted structured interviews by phone or by Google Meet over the course of May through June 2020. The authors note that the sample over-represents public and larger institutions in the West and Midwest regions. A student worker transcribed the audio recordings and de-identified transcripts underwent iterative, thematic coding in MAXQDA, a qualitative data analysis tool. The authors used a grounded theory approach to conduct open coding, then identified relationships between themes, and elaborated upon each theme based on its relationship to a theoretical model of morale impact avenues in library organizational structures, which was developed by one of the authors.\nMain Results –The authors uncovered that most study participants (n = 21) reported having high levels of morale, a surprise to the research team who expected that participants with lower levels of morale would participate in the study. Most participants (n = 27) worked in public and larger institutions, and the majority were female (n = 24), though only 5 were Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). Participants mostly had MLIS degrees or other advanced degrees. The results of the study expanded beyond the original research questions to comprise a broader set of factors that impact morale levels including relationships with colleagues and direct managers, opportunities for advancement, respect, work autonomy, and funding. Respondents emphasized that staff morale was significantly impacted by their relationship with direct managers, noting that micromanagement, defensiveness, and lack of accommodations contributed to lower levels of morale and a sense of disconnection. Managers who were supportive, advocated for staff needs, and were good listeners improved morale. Relationships between staff and their librarian colleagues also impacted morale, with the librarian–staff divide and treatment of staff by librarians being major contributors to influencing morale. Additionally, staff felt that having or lacking respect from librarians and administration and having autonomy and flexibility in their work made a big impact on morale. Having opportunities to meaningfully engage, to advance in the workplace, to receive professional development funding, to participate in decision-making processes, and to feel valued by the institution contributed to higher levels of staff morale.\nConclusion – Library staff morale is impacted mostly by staff members’ sense of connection, respect, and value within the institution and among their librarian colleagues, direct managers, and library administration. Having pathways for advancement and professional development, meaningful opportunities to contribute to institutional decision-making, and autonomy over their professional and personal lives contributed to a higher sense of staff morale. The authors highlight several practical recommendations for improving staff morale including fostering a respectful environment, advocating for more flexible and better work environments, and providing opportunities for professional development and growth.","PeriodicalId":45227,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Review of:Glusker, A., Emmelhainz, C., Estrada, N., & Dyess, B. (2022). “Viewed as equals”: The impacts of library organizational cultures and management on library staff morale. Journal of Library Administration, 62(2), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2026119 Objective – To explore what library organizational factors influence library staff morale. Design – Semi-structured interview, grounded theory. Setting – Academic libraries across the United States during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Subjects – 34 academic library staff, defined by the authors as employees whose positions do not require an MLIS degree and do not include the title “librarian”, from 23 private and public colleges and universities across 16 states, mostly representative of the West and Midwest regions. Methods – In 2020, the authors emailed a call for study participants to library listservs and state library associations across the US, selected a convenience sample of 34 library staff from academic institutions, and conducted structured interviews by phone or by Google Meet over the course of May through June 2020. The authors note that the sample over-represents public and larger institutions in the West and Midwest regions. A student worker transcribed the audio recordings and de-identified transcripts underwent iterative, thematic coding in MAXQDA, a qualitative data analysis tool. The authors used a grounded theory approach to conduct open coding, then identified relationships between themes, and elaborated upon each theme based on its relationship to a theoretical model of morale impact avenues in library organizational structures, which was developed by one of the authors. Main Results –The authors uncovered that most study participants (n = 21) reported having high levels of morale, a surprise to the research team who expected that participants with lower levels of morale would participate in the study. Most participants (n = 27) worked in public and larger institutions, and the majority were female (n = 24), though only 5 were Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). Participants mostly had MLIS degrees or other advanced degrees. The results of the study expanded beyond the original research questions to comprise a broader set of factors that impact morale levels including relationships with colleagues and direct managers, opportunities for advancement, respect, work autonomy, and funding. Respondents emphasized that staff morale was significantly impacted by their relationship with direct managers, noting that micromanagement, defensiveness, and lack of accommodations contributed to lower levels of morale and a sense of disconnection. Managers who were supportive, advocated for staff needs, and were good listeners improved morale. Relationships between staff and their librarian colleagues also impacted morale, with the librarian–staff divide and treatment of staff by librarians being major contributors to influencing morale. Additionally, staff felt that having or lacking respect from librarians and administration and having autonomy and flexibility in their work made a big impact on morale. Having opportunities to meaningfully engage, to advance in the workplace, to receive professional development funding, to participate in decision-making processes, and to feel valued by the institution contributed to higher levels of staff morale. Conclusion – Library staff morale is impacted mostly by staff members’ sense of connection, respect, and value within the institution and among their librarian colleagues, direct managers, and library administration. Having pathways for advancement and professional development, meaningful opportunities to contribute to institutional decision-making, and autonomy over their professional and personal lives contributed to a higher sense of staff morale. The authors highlight several practical recommendations for improving staff morale including fostering a respectful environment, advocating for more flexible and better work environments, and providing opportunities for professional development and growth.
图书馆工作人员的士气与他们对工作的尊重和重视,与直接主管和同事的关系,以及在工作环境中的自主性和灵活性有关
回顾:Glusker, A., Emmelhainz, C., Estrada, N., & Dyess, B.(2022)。“平等看待”:图书馆组织文化与管理对图书馆员工士气的影响。图书管理,62(2),153-189。https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2026119Objective -探讨影响图书馆员工士气的组织因素。设计——半结构化面试,扎根理论。背景-在COVID-19大流行的最初几个月里,美国各地的学术图书馆。研究对象:来自16个州的23所私立和公立学院和大学的34名学术图书馆工作人员,作者将其定义为不需要MLIS学位,也不包括“图书馆员”头衔的员工,主要代表西部和中西部地区。方法:2020年,作者通过电子邮件向美国各地的图书馆列表服务和州图书馆协会发出了研究参与者的呼吁,从学术机构选择了34名图书馆工作人员作为方便样本,并在2020年5月至6月期间通过电话或谷歌Meet进行了结构化访谈。作者指出,样本过度代表了西部和中西部地区的公共和大型机构。一名学生工作者转录了音频记录,并在定性数据分析工具MAXQDA中进行了反复的主题编码。作者使用基于理论的方法进行开放编码,然后确定主题之间的关系,并根据其与图书馆组织结构中士气影响途径的理论模型的关系详细阐述每个主题,该模型是由一位作者开发的。主要结果——作者发现,大多数研究参与者(n = 21)都有很高的士气,这让研究团队感到惊讶,他们原本以为士气较低的参与者会参与这项研究。大多数参与者(n = 27)在公共和大型机构工作,大多数是女性(n = 24),尽管只有5人是黑人、土著人和有色人种(BIPOC)。参与者大多拥有MLIS学位或其他高级学位。该研究的结果超出了最初的研究问题,包括影响士气水平的一系列更广泛的因素,包括与同事和直接管理者的关系、晋升机会、尊重、工作自主权和资金。受访者强调,员工的士气受到他们与直接管理者的关系的显著影响,并指出微观管理、防御和缺乏住宿会导致士气下降和疏离感。支持、支持员工需求、善于倾听的管理者能提高员工的士气。员工和他们的图书馆员同事之间的关系也会影响士气,图书馆员和员工之间的分歧以及图书馆员对待员工的方式是影响士气的主要因素。此外,工作人员认为,获得或缺乏图书管理员和管理部门的尊重,以及在工作中拥有自主权和灵活性,对士气有很大影响。有机会有意义地参与,在工作场所进步,获得专业发展资金,参与决策过程,并感受到被机构重视,有助于提高员工士气。结论——图书馆员工的士气主要受到员工在机构内部以及在他们的图书馆员同事、直接管理者和图书馆管理部门之间的联系感、尊重感和价值感的影响。拥有晋升和专业发展的途径,为机构决策做出贡献的有意义的机会,以及对其职业和个人生活的自主权,有助于提高员工的士气。作者强调了一些提高员工士气的实用建议,包括营造一个相互尊重的环境,倡导更灵活、更好的工作环境,以及提供专业发展和成长的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信