Can We Mitigate Covid-19 Related Work Strain Among Civil Servants? Examining the Role of Organizational Commitment, Job Autonomy and Workplace Social Support

IF 2.2 3区管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Performance & Management Review Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI:10.1080/15309576.2022.2123836

Dries Van Doninck, Danika Pieters, J. Wynen, Bjorn Kleizen, Stéphanie Verlinden, K. Verhoest

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The extraordinary measures taken to constrain infections with the coronavirus may have altered the known psychological processes preventing stress and strain in the public workplace. We use survey data of a large public organization in Belgium to look at the capacity of affective organizational commitment, perceived job autonomy, and workplace social support to buffer the impact of Covid-19 measures on work strain. We find a negative effect of perceived job autonomy on stress resulting from Covid-19 measures. We find no support for the buffering effect of affective organizational commitment and workplace social support on employee strain induced by Covid-19 measures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

我们能否缓解公务员中与新冠肺炎相关的工作压力？考察组织承诺、工作自主性和工作场所社会支持的作用

摘要为控制冠状病毒感染而采取的特殊措施可能改变了已知的预防公共工作场所压力和紧张的心理过程。我们使用比利时一家大型公共组织的调查数据来研究情感组织承诺、感知的工作自主性和工作场所社会支持的能力，以缓冲新冠肺炎措施对工作压力的影响。我们发现，感知的工作自主性对新冠肺炎措施造成的压力有负面影响。我们没有发现支持情感组织承诺和工作场所社会支持对新冠肺炎措施引起的员工压力的缓冲作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Public Performance & Management Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

16.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.