As figuras na argumentação: o caso do debate eleitoral de 2018 / The Figures in Argumentation: the Case of the 2018 Electoral Debate

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
R. Mazzola, J. Kogawa
{"title":"As figuras na argumentação: o caso do debate eleitoral de 2018 / The Figures in Argumentation: the Case of the 2018 Electoral Debate","authors":"R. Mazzola, J. Kogawa","doi":"10.17851/2237-2083.30.3.1437-1468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In this paper, we analyze the rhetorical figures that equip the arguments of six candidates for the presidency of the republic in the context of the pre-electoral debates of the 2018 presidential race. We assume that figures are not only ornaments of language, but real persuasion equipment. For this purpose, we developed three research questions: a) how do figures equip language? b) how can figures build persuasion in deliberative political discourse? c) how do figures integrate argument types to equip them? We base our research in the domains of rhetoric, argumentation and discourse, particularly in the works of Aristotle (2013), Barthes (2001), Perelman and Tyteca (2014), Fiorin (2020), Plantin (2008), Amossy (2020), Abreu (2009), Ferreira (2015) and Courtine (1990). Methodologically, the research has a bibliographic-documental character, of a descriptive and explanatory nature. Our corpus is composed of excerpts from the speeches of the six candidates for the republic in the televised pre-election debate on RedeTV, held on August 17, 2018 and available on the video sharing platform Youtube. With regard to the results, we demonstrate that the presence of certain figures of rhetoric - such as metaphor, metonymy, personification, comparison, etc. - contributed to the intensification of the arguments of these candidates, increasing the effectiveness of the arguments and, consequently, contributing to the adhesion of spirits.","PeriodicalId":42188,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.30.3.1437-1468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In this paper, we analyze the rhetorical figures that equip the arguments of six candidates for the presidency of the republic in the context of the pre-electoral debates of the 2018 presidential race. We assume that figures are not only ornaments of language, but real persuasion equipment. For this purpose, we developed three research questions: a) how do figures equip language? b) how can figures build persuasion in deliberative political discourse? c) how do figures integrate argument types to equip them? We base our research in the domains of rhetoric, argumentation and discourse, particularly in the works of Aristotle (2013), Barthes (2001), Perelman and Tyteca (2014), Fiorin (2020), Plantin (2008), Amossy (2020), Abreu (2009), Ferreira (2015) and Courtine (1990). Methodologically, the research has a bibliographic-documental character, of a descriptive and explanatory nature. Our corpus is composed of excerpts from the speeches of the six candidates for the republic in the televised pre-election debate on RedeTV, held on August 17, 2018 and available on the video sharing platform Youtube. With regard to the results, we demonstrate that the presence of certain figures of rhetoric - such as metaphor, metonymy, personification, comparison, etc. - contributed to the intensification of the arguments of these candidates, increasing the effectiveness of the arguments and, consequently, contributing to the adhesion of spirits.
争论中的数字:以2018年选举辩论为例
:在本文中,我们分析了在2018年总统竞选的选前辩论中,为六位共和国总统候选人的论点提供论据的修辞数字。我们认为人物不仅是语言的装饰品,而且是真正的说服工具。为此,我们提出了三个研究问题:a)数字如何装备语言?b) 人物如何在深思熟虑的政治话语中建立说服力?c) 数字是如何整合论点类型来装备它们的?我们的研究基于修辞、论证和话语领域,特别是亚里士多德(2013)、巴特(2001)、佩雷尔曼和泰特卡(2014)、菲奥林(2020)、普兰廷(2008)、阿莫西(2020),阿布雷乌(2009)、费雷拉(2015)和考廷(1990)的著作。在方法论上,这项研究具有文献性、描述性和解释性。我们的语料库由六位共和国候选人在2018年8月17日RedeTV举行的选举前电视辩论中的演讲摘录组成,可在视频共享平台Youtube上获得。关于这些结果,我们证明了某些修辞手法的存在,如隐喻、转喻、拟人化、比较等,有助于强化这些候选者的论点,提高论点的有效性,从而有助于精神的凝聚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信