Youth identities and affinities on the move: using a transliteracies framework to critique digital dichotomies

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David E. Low, Sarah M. Rapp
{"title":"Youth identities and affinities on the move: using a transliteracies framework to critique digital dichotomies","authors":"David E. Low, Sarah M. Rapp","doi":"10.1080/1554480X.2021.1914053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A number of literacy theorists have worked to describe what is new and different about youth enactments of literacy in the digital age. In doing so, many invoke “digital dichotomies,” or oppositional framings meant to differentiate among various enactments of literacy (i.e. digital vs. analog, online vs. offline, out-of-school vs. in-school). We argue that digital dichotomies do not adequately convey the creativity, permeability, messiness, and movement of youth literacies in practice. In this article we employ a transliteracies framework to examine youths’ textual production and identity mediation across physical and virtual domains. Focusing on two telling cases of student participation in affinity spaces (one dedicated to manga, the other skateboarding), we find that adolescents traverse spaces and employ tools with creative and agentive fluidity to participate in transliterate affinity communities. Youth do not consider tools and spaces to be dichotomous or determinative of their literate engagements. We encourage researchers and educators to move beyond using dichotomies to theorize literate phenomena in the digital age. Identity and youth culture are anything but static and neither should be the lenses researchers use to study them.","PeriodicalId":45770,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1554480X.2021.1914053","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2021.1914053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT A number of literacy theorists have worked to describe what is new and different about youth enactments of literacy in the digital age. In doing so, many invoke “digital dichotomies,” or oppositional framings meant to differentiate among various enactments of literacy (i.e. digital vs. analog, online vs. offline, out-of-school vs. in-school). We argue that digital dichotomies do not adequately convey the creativity, permeability, messiness, and movement of youth literacies in practice. In this article we employ a transliteracies framework to examine youths’ textual production and identity mediation across physical and virtual domains. Focusing on two telling cases of student participation in affinity spaces (one dedicated to manga, the other skateboarding), we find that adolescents traverse spaces and employ tools with creative and agentive fluidity to participate in transliterate affinity communities. Youth do not consider tools and spaces to be dichotomous or determinative of their literate engagements. We encourage researchers and educators to move beyond using dichotomies to theorize literate phenomena in the digital age. Identity and youth culture are anything but static and neither should be the lenses researchers use to study them.
流动中的青年身份和亲和力:使用跨文学框架批判数字二分法
摘要许多扫盲理论家致力于描述数字时代青年扫盲的新特点和不同之处。在这样做的过程中,许多人援引了“数字二分法”,或对立的框架,旨在区分各种识字行为(即数字与模拟、在线与离线、校外与校内)。我们认为,数字二分法在实践中没有充分传达青年文学的创造力、渗透性、混乱性和运动性。在这篇文章中,我们采用了一个跨文本的框架来考察年轻人在物理和虚拟领域的文本生产和身份中介。通过关注两个学生参与亲和空间的案例(一个是漫画,另一个是滑板),我们发现青少年穿越空间,使用具有创造性和能动性的工具来参与音译亲和社区。青年人不认为工具和空间是二分法的,也不认为它们决定了他们的识字活动。我们鼓励研究人员和教育工作者超越二分法,将数字时代的识字现象理论化。身份认同和青年文化绝不是静态的,也不应该成为研究人员用来研究它们的镜头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogies
Pedagogies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信