{"title":"Eine Antwort auf die «Krise der Medizin»? Die Moderne Konstitutionslehre im Krisendiskurs 1925 bis 1933","authors":"Nadine Metzger","doi":"10.1163/22977953-07601003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussing the alleged «crisis of medicine» (ca. 1925–33) German physicians addressed the underlying mindset of medical theory and practice. Identifi ed as «scientifi c crisis», they called the scientifi c epistemology of medicine into question. Since 1911 modern constitutional medicine had offered concepts potentially useful to overcome this «crisis». Besides similar topics the two discussions shared prominent voices, presenting their ideas for better medicine in both discourses. However, this paper shows the minor role constitutional medicine actually played in the «crisis» discussion. It was rarely put forward as a solution to the supposed «crisis» and is conspicuously often discovered in discussions of historical background. Far more often, concepts designed to overcome constitutional medicine are invoked as a potential crisis solution, fi rst and foremost the so-called «constitutional therapy» fathered by Vienna gynaecologist Bernhard Aschner which evokes pre-modern humoral pathology.","PeriodicalId":42764,"journal":{"name":"Gesnerus-Swiss Journal of the History of Medicine and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesnerus-Swiss Journal of the History of Medicine and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22977953-07601003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Discussing the alleged «crisis of medicine» (ca. 1925–33) German physicians addressed the underlying mindset of medical theory and practice. Identifi ed as «scientifi c crisis», they called the scientifi c epistemology of medicine into question. Since 1911 modern constitutional medicine had offered concepts potentially useful to overcome this «crisis». Besides similar topics the two discussions shared prominent voices, presenting their ideas for better medicine in both discourses. However, this paper shows the minor role constitutional medicine actually played in the «crisis» discussion. It was rarely put forward as a solution to the supposed «crisis» and is conspicuously often discovered in discussions of historical background. Far more often, concepts designed to overcome constitutional medicine are invoked as a potential crisis solution, fi rst and foremost the so-called «constitutional therapy» fathered by Vienna gynaecologist Bernhard Aschner which evokes pre-modern humoral pathology.
期刊介绍:
Gesnerus is the official journal of the Swiss Society for the History of Medicine and Sciences (SSHMS). It publishes original articles, short communications and documents on different periods and aspects of the history of medicine and sciences and also focuses on theoretical and social aspects of this subject.