Ritu R. Nathawani, N. Chandra, Y. V. Abhijith, A. Ramesh, M. Ramesh
{"title":"Role of Pulse Oximetry as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Congenital Heart Disease in Newborn Babies","authors":"Ritu R. Nathawani, N. Chandra, Y. V. Abhijith, A. Ramesh, M. Ramesh","doi":"10.4103/am.am_55_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the commonly seen malformations, with incidence varying from 7 to 8/1000 live birth. Causes are multifactorial. Routine examination of neonates may miss more than 50% of cases. Pulse oximetry is a simple, noninvasive, bedside test which estimates the percentage of oxygen bound to hemoglobin (oxygen saturation [SpO2]). Detection of critical CHD (CCHD) has been possible with SpO2 screening. Many countries included SpO2 as part of newborn screening due to this. As a primary approach, both pre- and post-ductal extremity SpO2 is measured after 24 h of life. Echocardiography (ECHO) will be done on neonates with SpO2 readings <95%. Neonates born in high-altitude regions, studies have suggest to use adjusted threshold values. In India, there are limited studies.\n \n \n \n The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of pulse oximetry as a screening tool for early detection of CHD in otherwise asymptomatic newborns. To determine, the accuracy of SpO2 for detecting clinically unrecognized CCHD in newborns.\n \n \n \n This is a prospective observational study done in the department of pediatrics in a tertiary hospital. The study was conducted over 12 months. During the study period, all neonates born who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. After 24 h of life, neonates were examined clinically and the pre- and post-ductal SpO2 was measured. Neonates with SpO2 <90% in room air were excluded from the study. If the SpO2 was between 90% and 94%, clinical examination was repeated, if suspicious of CHD, they were referred for ECHO. If there was no suspicion of CHD, SpO2 was repeated after 6 h and ECHO was done if SpO2 ≤95. The difference of SpO2 >3% between the right upper limb and right lower limb was considered positive. Positive neonates were evaluated with two-dimensional echocardiograph. Inclusion criteria - All hemodynamically stable neonates were born during the study period. Exclusion criteria (1) Antenatally diagnosed cardiac anomalies, (2) Outborn neonates, (3) Parents/guardians are not willing to participate in the study and/or further investigation, (4) Sick neonates and those with SpO2 <90% at birth.\n \n \n \n 1117 (83.7%) were eligible for the study out of 1333 neonates born. 669 (59.9%) were born by cesarean section and 448 (40.1%) by vaginal delivery. 996 (89.2%) were born at term (≥37 weeks of gestation) and 121 (10.8%) were preterm (<37 weeks of gestation). The male-to-female ratio was 1.03:1. The mean birth weight of the neonates was 2.91 ± 0.46 kg (mean ± standard deviation). The mean SPO2 in the right upper limb was 96.62 ± 1.73, in the right lower limb was 96.87 ± 1.76, in the left upper limb was 96.59 ± 1.90, and in the left lower limb was 97.06 ± 1.74. The average SPO2 difference between the right upper limb and right lower limb was 1.04 ± 1.07. Based on SpO2, 858 (76.8%) cases were not suspected of having CHD and 259 (23.3%) were suspected of having CHD and were evaluated with ECHO. Six (0.5%) neonates had CHD in whom echo was done. In our study, for detecting CCHD, SPO2 cutoff value of ≤90% showed 90% sensitivity, 99.94% specificity, 75% positive predictive value, and 99.98% negative predictive value.\n \n \n \n This study emphasizes noninvasive SPO2 as reliable and feasible, with good negative predictive value screening for CHD in neonates.\n","PeriodicalId":34670,"journal":{"name":"Apollo Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apollo Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/am.am_55_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the commonly seen malformations, with incidence varying from 7 to 8/1000 live birth. Causes are multifactorial. Routine examination of neonates may miss more than 50% of cases. Pulse oximetry is a simple, noninvasive, bedside test which estimates the percentage of oxygen bound to hemoglobin (oxygen saturation [SpO2]). Detection of critical CHD (CCHD) has been possible with SpO2 screening. Many countries included SpO2 as part of newborn screening due to this. As a primary approach, both pre- and post-ductal extremity SpO2 is measured after 24 h of life. Echocardiography (ECHO) will be done on neonates with SpO2 readings <95%. Neonates born in high-altitude regions, studies have suggest to use adjusted threshold values. In India, there are limited studies.
The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of pulse oximetry as a screening tool for early detection of CHD in otherwise asymptomatic newborns. To determine, the accuracy of SpO2 for detecting clinically unrecognized CCHD in newborns.
This is a prospective observational study done in the department of pediatrics in a tertiary hospital. The study was conducted over 12 months. During the study period, all neonates born who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. After 24 h of life, neonates were examined clinically and the pre- and post-ductal SpO2 was measured. Neonates with SpO2 <90% in room air were excluded from the study. If the SpO2 was between 90% and 94%, clinical examination was repeated, if suspicious of CHD, they were referred for ECHO. If there was no suspicion of CHD, SpO2 was repeated after 6 h and ECHO was done if SpO2 ≤95. The difference of SpO2 >3% between the right upper limb and right lower limb was considered positive. Positive neonates were evaluated with two-dimensional echocardiograph. Inclusion criteria - All hemodynamically stable neonates were born during the study period. Exclusion criteria (1) Antenatally diagnosed cardiac anomalies, (2) Outborn neonates, (3) Parents/guardians are not willing to participate in the study and/or further investigation, (4) Sick neonates and those with SpO2 <90% at birth.
1117 (83.7%) were eligible for the study out of 1333 neonates born. 669 (59.9%) were born by cesarean section and 448 (40.1%) by vaginal delivery. 996 (89.2%) were born at term (≥37 weeks of gestation) and 121 (10.8%) were preterm (<37 weeks of gestation). The male-to-female ratio was 1.03:1. The mean birth weight of the neonates was 2.91 ± 0.46 kg (mean ± standard deviation). The mean SPO2 in the right upper limb was 96.62 ± 1.73, in the right lower limb was 96.87 ± 1.76, in the left upper limb was 96.59 ± 1.90, and in the left lower limb was 97.06 ± 1.74. The average SPO2 difference between the right upper limb and right lower limb was 1.04 ± 1.07. Based on SpO2, 858 (76.8%) cases were not suspected of having CHD and 259 (23.3%) were suspected of having CHD and were evaluated with ECHO. Six (0.5%) neonates had CHD in whom echo was done. In our study, for detecting CCHD, SPO2 cutoff value of ≤90% showed 90% sensitivity, 99.94% specificity, 75% positive predictive value, and 99.98% negative predictive value.
This study emphasizes noninvasive SPO2 as reliable and feasible, with good negative predictive value screening for CHD in neonates.