Extremity high-grade sarcomas in elderly patients, are they candidates for surgery? Experience in a sarcoma referral center.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s13193-022-01652-1
Daniel Escobar-Mendiola, Lydia Mediavilla-Santos, Rubén Pérez-Mañanes, Miguel Cuervo-Dehesa, Javier Vaquero-Martin, José Calvo-Haro
{"title":"Extremity high-grade sarcomas in elderly patients, are they candidates for surgery? Experience in a sarcoma referral center.","authors":"Daniel Escobar-Mendiola, Lydia Mediavilla-Santos, Rubén Pérez-Mañanes, Miguel Cuervo-Dehesa, Javier Vaquero-Martin, José Calvo-Haro","doi":"10.1007/s13193-022-01652-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of elderly patients diagnosed with cancer is increasing. However, knowledge regarding cancer in elderly patients is very scarce. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in management and outcomes of high-grade extremity sarcomas between elderly and middle-aged patients. Two cohorts were made (> 70 and 30/50 years old) among patients treated in a multidisciplinary unit of a national reference center between 2011 and 2017 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The management and outcomes between these two cohorts were compared. Seventy patients were included, 34 young patients and 36 elderly patients. The only difference between the treatment schemes was the chemotherapy used, 67.6% of the young patients received chemotherapy versus 16.7% of the elderly patients (<i>p</i> = 0.000015). There were no differences either in the overall survival or the progression-free survival between groups at 1 and 2-year follow-up. Deceases for other causes were nearly exclusive of elderly patients at a median of 45.57 months. Surgery is the treatment of choice for sarcomas in both elderly and young patients having similar results in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, and surgery outcomes. The use of chemotherapy is the only difference in the treatment schemes between both groups. In the elderly patient with minimal or no comorbidity and good functional reserve, surgical curative treatment should be chosen. As for frail elderly patients, the therapeutic objectives must be focused mainly on quality of life and palliation of symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"1 1","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10963351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01652-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of elderly patients diagnosed with cancer is increasing. However, knowledge regarding cancer in elderly patients is very scarce. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in management and outcomes of high-grade extremity sarcomas between elderly and middle-aged patients. Two cohorts were made (> 70 and 30/50 years old) among patients treated in a multidisciplinary unit of a national reference center between 2011 and 2017 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The management and outcomes between these two cohorts were compared. Seventy patients were included, 34 young patients and 36 elderly patients. The only difference between the treatment schemes was the chemotherapy used, 67.6% of the young patients received chemotherapy versus 16.7% of the elderly patients (p = 0.000015). There were no differences either in the overall survival or the progression-free survival between groups at 1 and 2-year follow-up. Deceases for other causes were nearly exclusive of elderly patients at a median of 45.57 months. Surgery is the treatment of choice for sarcomas in both elderly and young patients having similar results in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, and surgery outcomes. The use of chemotherapy is the only difference in the treatment schemes between both groups. In the elderly patient with minimal or no comorbidity and good functional reserve, surgical curative treatment should be chosen. As for frail elderly patients, the therapeutic objectives must be focused mainly on quality of life and palliation of symptoms.

老年患者的四肢高级肉瘤是否适合手术治疗?肉瘤转诊中心的经验
被诊断出患有癌症的老年患者人数不断增加。然而,有关老年癌症患者的知识却非常匮乏。本研究旨在分析老年和中年患者在高级别四肢肉瘤的治疗和预后方面的差异。研究人员对 2011 年至 2017 年期间在一家国家参考资料中心多学科病房接受治疗的患者(年龄大于 70 岁和 30/50 岁)进行了至少 2 年的随访。对这两个组群的管理和结果进行了比较。研究共纳入了 70 例患者,其中 34 例为年轻患者,36 例为老年患者。治疗方案之间的唯一差异在于化疗的使用,67.6%的年轻患者接受了化疗,而16.7%的老年患者接受了化疗(P = 0.000015)。在 1 年和 2 年的随访中,两组患者的总生存期和无进展生存期均无差异。老年患者几乎没有因其他原因死亡,中位死亡时间为 45.57 个月。手术是治疗肉瘤的首选方法,老年患者和年轻患者在无进展生存期、总生存期和手术效果方面的结果相似。化疗的使用是两组患者治疗方案的唯一区别。对于合并症少或无合并症、功能储备良好的老年患者,应选择手术根治治疗。至于体弱的老年患者,治疗目标必须主要集中在生活质量和缓解症状上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信