The impact of synchronous collaborative writing and Google Docs collaborative features on enhancing students’ individual writing performance

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Husam Masaoud Alwahoub, Nayef Jomaa, M. Azmi
{"title":"The impact of synchronous collaborative writing and Google Docs collaborative features on enhancing students’ individual writing performance","authors":"Husam Masaoud Alwahoub, Nayef Jomaa, M. Azmi","doi":"10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative writing has gained researchers’ attention due to its efficiency in enhancing students’ writing abilities compared to traditional writing. More recently, more emphasis has been on computer-based versions of collaborative writing because of the introduction of Web 2.0 and other cloud-based writing tools, such as Google Docs and Wikis, especially at the tertiary level. However, there is still a dearth of research regarding synchronous collaborative writing in mainstream K-12 classes. Therefore, this quasi-experimental quantitative study aims at investigating the impact of synchronous collaborative writing on developing fourth-grade EFL students’ writing. The data were collected from the pre-tests and the post-tests of 49 students in a technology-supportive K-12 school in Riyadh-Saudi Arabia and were analyzed using independent samples t-test via SPSS version 23. The analysis of individual writing performance in the pre- and post- tests revealed that the total mean scores of the Content, Language use, and Organisation measurements have increased in both the experimental group, after experiencing collaborative writing using Google Docs, and the control group, who used traditional pen-and-paper writing. In addition, significant differences existed in the three writing tasks (Narrative, Argumentative, and Informative) in the post-test scores of the experimental group as well as in the post-test scores between the groups, with the experimental group scoring higher than the traditional writing group. However, no significant difference was revealed between the pre- and post- test scores of the control group. In addition, it was found that the task type variable plays a vital role in collaborative writing. These findings are significant for both educators and students in implementing computer-based collaborative writing in mainstream classes and for researchers who are interested in web-based education and E-learning.","PeriodicalId":38082,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative writing has gained researchers’ attention due to its efficiency in enhancing students’ writing abilities compared to traditional writing. More recently, more emphasis has been on computer-based versions of collaborative writing because of the introduction of Web 2.0 and other cloud-based writing tools, such as Google Docs and Wikis, especially at the tertiary level. However, there is still a dearth of research regarding synchronous collaborative writing in mainstream K-12 classes. Therefore, this quasi-experimental quantitative study aims at investigating the impact of synchronous collaborative writing on developing fourth-grade EFL students’ writing. The data were collected from the pre-tests and the post-tests of 49 students in a technology-supportive K-12 school in Riyadh-Saudi Arabia and were analyzed using independent samples t-test via SPSS version 23. The analysis of individual writing performance in the pre- and post- tests revealed that the total mean scores of the Content, Language use, and Organisation measurements have increased in both the experimental group, after experiencing collaborative writing using Google Docs, and the control group, who used traditional pen-and-paper writing. In addition, significant differences existed in the three writing tasks (Narrative, Argumentative, and Informative) in the post-test scores of the experimental group as well as in the post-test scores between the groups, with the experimental group scoring higher than the traditional writing group. However, no significant difference was revealed between the pre- and post- test scores of the control group. In addition, it was found that the task type variable plays a vital role in collaborative writing. These findings are significant for both educators and students in implementing computer-based collaborative writing in mainstream classes and for researchers who are interested in web-based education and E-learning.
同步协作写作和b谷歌Docs协作功能对提高学生个人写作成绩的影响
与传统写作相比,合作写作能有效地提高学生的写作能力,因此受到了研究者的关注。最近,由于Web 2.0和其他基于云的写作工具(如谷歌文档和维基)的引入,尤其是在第三层次,协作写作的计算机版本得到了更多的重视。然而,在主流K-12课程中,关于同步协作写作的研究仍然缺乏。因此,本研究旨在探讨同步合作写作对四年级英语写作发展的影响。这些数据是从沙特阿拉伯利雅得一所技术支持的K-12学校的49名学生的测试前和测试后收集的,并通过SPSS 23版使用独立样本t检验进行分析。对测试前和测试后个人写作表现的分析显示,在使用谷歌文档进行协作写作后,实验组和使用传统纸笔写作的对照组的内容、语言使用和组织测量的总平均分数都有所提高。此外,在三项写作任务(叙事、辩论和信息)中,实验组的测试后得分以及两组之间的测试后分数存在显著差异,实验组得分高于传统写作组。然而,对照组在测试前和测试后的得分之间没有显著差异。此外,研究发现,任务类型变量在合作写作中起着至关重要的作用。这些发现对教育工作者和学生在主流课堂上实施基于计算机的协作写作以及对网络教育和电子学习感兴趣的研究人员都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of this Journal is to promote a principled approach to research on language and language-related concerns by encouraging enquiry into relationship between theoretical and practical studies. The journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current analysis in: first, second, and foreign language teaching and learning; language in education; language planning, language testing; curriculum design and development; multilingualism and multilingual education; discourse analysis; translation; clinical linguistics; literature and teaching; and. forensic linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信