A FEW REMARKS REGARDING EVIDENCE FROM THE INTERROGATION OF A WITNESS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SUBJECT OF A COMMUNITY INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN A CRIMINAL CASE (ARTICLES 214 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE)

Probacja Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.6042
Piotr Rogoziński
{"title":"A FEW REMARKS REGARDING EVIDENCE\nFROM THE INTERROGATION OF A WITNESS\nIN CONNECTION WITH THE SUBJECT OF\nA COMMUNITY INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN\nA CRIMINAL CASE (ARTICLES 214 OF THE CODE OF\nCRIMINAL PROCEDURE)","authors":"Piotr Rogoziński","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author discusses the role of documentary evidence in the form\nof the background survey in criminal proceedings. He also examines the\npossibilities and scope of verification of its content by interviewing as\nwitnesses the person who conducted the evidence and the persons who\nprovided information as part of the background survey. He emphasizes\nthat it is justified in this case – in the context of the principle expressed in\nArt. 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure – different approach to admitting\nand taking evidence from the testimonies of witnesses on the\ncircumstances covered by the background survey. The article attempts\nto select typical cases in which it would be advisable to admit evidence\nfrom the testimonies of witnesses for the circumstances identified through\nthe background survey.\n\n","PeriodicalId":34028,"journal":{"name":"Probacja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author discusses the role of documentary evidence in the form of the background survey in criminal proceedings. He also examines the possibilities and scope of verification of its content by interviewing as witnesses the person who conducted the evidence and the persons who provided information as part of the background survey. He emphasizes that it is justified in this case – in the context of the principle expressed in Art. 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure – different approach to admitting and taking evidence from the testimonies of witnesses on the circumstances covered by the background survey. The article attempts to select typical cases in which it would be advisable to admit evidence from the testimonies of witnesses for the circumstances identified through the background survey.
关于刑事案件中与社区面谈主题有关的讯问证人证据的几点评论(《刑事诉讼法》第214条)
论述了书证在刑事诉讼中以背景调查的形式发挥的作用。他还通过采访证人、提供证据的人和作为背景调查的一部分提供信息的人,来审查其内容核实的可能性和范围。他强调,在这种情况下,在艺术表达原则的背景下,这是合理的。《刑事诉讼法》第174条-从证人关于背景调查所涉情况的证词中承认和取得证据的不同方法。本文试图选择典型案例,针对背景调查所确定的情况,从证人的证词中采信证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信