Evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of differant all-ceramic porcelain systems

Q3 Dentistry
Akın Coşkun, Suat Yaluğ
{"title":"Evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of differant all-ceramic porcelain systems","authors":"Akın Coşkun, Suat Yaluğ","doi":"10.7126/cumudj.1103381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nPurpose: This study evaluated the marginal adaptation and microleakage of the İn-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia and Finesse press all-ceramic porcelain systems. \nMaterial and methods: Thirty maxillary Central teeth extracted for periodontal reasons without caries and cracks were divided equally into three group and there was no control group; only the three systems were compared. Sample teeth cemented were stored in distile water for 24 hours. Then, they were applied to a repeated thermal cycle for 500 times. The samples were left in %5 of basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. For the marginal adaptation rankings, all of the sample teeth for which cross-sections were made were moved into the metal microscope (Scherr Turico St. James/ Minn./ USA) and the marginal adaptation degrees were measured in both the palatinal and vestibul regions by measuring twice with x10 enlargement at micron level. For the statistical evaluations of marginal adaptation and microleakage values, Kruskal Wallis test has been used (p>0.05). Results: The differences between the three all-ceramic porcelain systems are not significant (p>0.05), α=0.05). \nConclusion: The Finesse porcelain system caused the least leakage in both regions. In second place in both regions was In-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia caused the most leakage in both regions. The biggest margin gap in the palatal region was seen in the Finesse porcelain system, In-Ceram Zirconia in second place. The least marginal gap was caused by the In- Ceram Alumina porcelain system.","PeriodicalId":10781,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1103381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study evaluated the marginal adaptation and microleakage of the İn-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia and Finesse press all-ceramic porcelain systems. Material and methods: Thirty maxillary Central teeth extracted for periodontal reasons without caries and cracks were divided equally into three group and there was no control group; only the three systems were compared. Sample teeth cemented were stored in distile water for 24 hours. Then, they were applied to a repeated thermal cycle for 500 times. The samples were left in %5 of basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. For the marginal adaptation rankings, all of the sample teeth for which cross-sections were made were moved into the metal microscope (Scherr Turico St. James/ Minn./ USA) and the marginal adaptation degrees were measured in both the palatinal and vestibul regions by measuring twice with x10 enlargement at micron level. For the statistical evaluations of marginal adaptation and microleakage values, Kruskal Wallis test has been used (p>0.05). Results: The differences between the three all-ceramic porcelain systems are not significant (p>0.05), α=0.05). Conclusion: The Finesse porcelain system caused the least leakage in both regions. In second place in both regions was In-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia caused the most leakage in both regions. The biggest margin gap in the palatal region was seen in the Finesse porcelain system, In-Ceram Zirconia in second place. The least marginal gap was caused by the In- Ceram Alumina porcelain system.
不同全陶瓷陶瓷体系的边际自适应及微泄漏评价
摘要目的:研究İn-Ceram氧化铝、İn-Ceram氧化锆和Finesse presse全陶瓷体系的边际适应性和微漏性。材料与方法:30颗因牙周原因拔牙无龋裂的上颌中牙平均分为3组,不设对照组;只比较了这三个系统。牙胶合后的样品在蒸馏水中保存24小时。然后,将其应用于重复热循环500次。样品在%5的碱性品红染料中放置24小时。对于边际适应性排名,所有的牙齿样本的横截面被移动到金属显微镜(Scherr Turico St. James/ Minn)。/ USA),在腭区和前庭区进行2次测量,在微米水平上进行x10放大。边际适应和微泄漏值的统计评价采用Kruskal Wallis检验(p>0.05)。结果:三种全陶瓷瓷系间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05), α=0.05)。结论:Finesse瓷系统对两区域的渗漏最小。在这两个区域中,排在第二位的是In- ceram Alumina, In- ceram Zirconia在这两个区域中造成的泄漏最多。在腭区最大的边缘间隙见于Finesse瓷系统,其次是in - ceram Zirconia。In- Ceram -氧化铝陶瓷体系产生的边际间隙最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信