Effectiveness of Student-Led Interventions on Improving Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic Review

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jen Nickelson, Ny’Nika McFadden, Paige Johnson, Alex Boucher
{"title":"Effectiveness of Student-Led Interventions on Improving Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic Review","authors":"Jen Nickelson, Ny’Nika McFadden, Paige Johnson, Alex Boucher","doi":"10.1080/19325037.2022.2100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Diabetes education and treatment is a public health priority. Student-delivered strategies have the potential to offer low-cost, high-quality healthcare services to underserved patients while giving students practice experience. However, the effectiveness of these interventions is unknown. Purpose To document study characteristics and the effectiveness of student-delivered interventions on diabetes health outcomes. Methods Databases searched included Medline, CINAHL Plus, and others. Appropriate keywords/subject headings were used to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently extracted data which were compared, and conflicts resolved by discussion. Results Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Six had statistically significant improvement in outcomes including HbA1c, a long-term glycemic control indicator (n = 4), blood pressure (n = 3), physical activity (n = 1), and exercise stage of change (n = 1). Studies involved medical (n = 3), pharmacy (n = 2), nursing (n = 1), and exercise science (n = 1) students. Studies with improved outcomes tended to have more patient contact. Discussion This review provides evidence that student-led diabetes interventions may be effective at improving outcomes, although studies reviewed are limited by lack of comparison groups and representative samples. Translation to Health Education Practice: Student-delivered diabetes interventions may improve outcomes, especially with adequate patient contact time. Studies of theory- and evidence-based student-led diabetes interventions involving health education/promotion students are warranted.","PeriodicalId":46846,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Education","volume":"53 1","pages":"325 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2022.2100020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Diabetes education and treatment is a public health priority. Student-delivered strategies have the potential to offer low-cost, high-quality healthcare services to underserved patients while giving students practice experience. However, the effectiveness of these interventions is unknown. Purpose To document study characteristics and the effectiveness of student-delivered interventions on diabetes health outcomes. Methods Databases searched included Medline, CINAHL Plus, and others. Appropriate keywords/subject headings were used to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently extracted data which were compared, and conflicts resolved by discussion. Results Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Six had statistically significant improvement in outcomes including HbA1c, a long-term glycemic control indicator (n = 4), blood pressure (n = 3), physical activity (n = 1), and exercise stage of change (n = 1). Studies involved medical (n = 3), pharmacy (n = 2), nursing (n = 1), and exercise science (n = 1) students. Studies with improved outcomes tended to have more patient contact. Discussion This review provides evidence that student-led diabetes interventions may be effective at improving outcomes, although studies reviewed are limited by lack of comparison groups and representative samples. Translation to Health Education Practice: Student-delivered diabetes interventions may improve outcomes, especially with adequate patient contact time. Studies of theory- and evidence-based student-led diabetes interventions involving health education/promotion students are warranted.
以学生为主导的干预措施对改善糖尿病预后的有效性:一项系统综述
背景糖尿病教育和治疗是公共卫生的优先事项。学生提供的策略有可能为缺医少药的患者提供低成本、高质量的医疗服务,同时让学生获得实践经验。然而,这些干预措施的有效性尚不清楚。目的记录研究特点和学生提供的干预措施对糖尿病健康结局的有效性。方法检索Medline、CINAHL Plus等数据库。使用适当的关键词/主题标题来识别符合纳入标准的研究。两位审稿人独立提取数据进行比较,并通过讨论解决冲突。结果7项研究符合纳入标准。6例患者的预后有统计学显著改善,包括HbA1c、长期血糖控制指标(n = 4)、血压(n = 3)、体力活动(n = 1)和运动阶段改变(n = 1)。研究涉及医学(n = 3)、药学(n = 2)、护理(n = 1)和运动科学(n = 1)学生。结果改善的研究往往有更多的病人接触。本综述提供的证据表明,学生主导的糖尿病干预可能有效改善预后,尽管所回顾的研究受到缺乏对照组和代表性样本的限制。转化为健康教育实践:学生提供的糖尿病干预可以改善结果,特别是有足够的患者接触时间。有必要研究以理论和证据为基础的学生主导的糖尿病干预措施,包括健康教育/促进学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Education
American Journal of Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: AJHE is sponsored by the American Association for Health Education of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. The mission of the American Association for Health Education(AAHE) is to advance the profession by serving health educators and others who strive to promote the health of all people through education and other systematic strategies.AAHE addresses the following priorities •Develop and promulgate standards, resources and services regarding health education to professionals and non-professionals •Foster the development of national research priorities in health education and promotion. Provide mechanisms for the translation and interaction between theory, research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信