Curriculum decisions made by secondary physical education teachers and comparison with students’ preferences

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dominique Banville, R. Marttinen, P. Kulinna, Matthew Ferry
{"title":"Curriculum decisions made by secondary physical education teachers and comparison with students’ preferences","authors":"Dominique Banville, R. Marttinen, P. Kulinna, Matthew Ferry","doi":"10.1080/25742981.2021.1893124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to gain an understanding of what impacts physical education teachers in their curriculum decision-making and how the activities chosen relate to what their students are interested in. Teachers (N = 76) and students (N = 258) from 12 purposely selected secondary schools located in a large school district in the United States participated by completing a questionnaire. Teachers indicated that curriculum decisions are made at the department level and that their teaching conditions are different from their colleagues in other subject areas. Activities favoured were primarily team sports, with some fitness activities and individual sports incorporated in the yearly plan. Students reported most engagement with jogging/running, walking, basketball, and cycling during their time away from school. The dominance of a team-sports driven curriculum persists against a wealth of evidence it may be misguided. If we want to change attitudes toward physical activity and physical education we must address the reliance on this type of curriculum in the United States.","PeriodicalId":36887,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"199 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742981.2021.1893124","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2021.1893124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to gain an understanding of what impacts physical education teachers in their curriculum decision-making and how the activities chosen relate to what their students are interested in. Teachers (N = 76) and students (N = 258) from 12 purposely selected secondary schools located in a large school district in the United States participated by completing a questionnaire. Teachers indicated that curriculum decisions are made at the department level and that their teaching conditions are different from their colleagues in other subject areas. Activities favoured were primarily team sports, with some fitness activities and individual sports incorporated in the yearly plan. Students reported most engagement with jogging/running, walking, basketball, and cycling during their time away from school. The dominance of a team-sports driven curriculum persists against a wealth of evidence it may be misguided. If we want to change attitudes toward physical activity and physical education we must address the reliance on this type of curriculum in the United States.
中学体育教师的课程决策及其与学生偏好的比较
摘要本研究的目的是了解体育教师在课程决策中受到的影响,以及所选择的活动与学生感兴趣的内容之间的关系 = 76)和学生(N = 258)通过填写问卷的方式参与了调查。教师们表示,课程决策是在系一级做出的,他们的教学条件与其他学科领域的同事不同。受欢迎的活动主要是团队运动,一些健身活动和个人运动被纳入年度计划。学生们报告说,他们在离开学校期间最喜欢慢跑/跑步、散步、打篮球和骑自行车。团队运动驱动课程的主导地位持续存在,但有大量证据表明它可能被误导了。如果我们想改变对体育活动和体育教育的态度,我们必须解决美国对这类课程的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信