A review of the methods used for subjective evaluation of De Qi

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yuan Hongwen , Wang Pei , Hu Nijuan , Zhang Peng , Li Chunhua , Liu Yuqi , Ma Liangxiao , Zhu Jiang
{"title":"A review of the methods used for subjective evaluation of De Qi","authors":"Yuan Hongwen ,&nbsp;Wang Pei ,&nbsp;Hu Nijuan ,&nbsp;Zhang Peng ,&nbsp;Li Chunhua ,&nbsp;Liu Yuqi ,&nbsp;Ma Liangxiao ,&nbsp;Zhu Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcm.2017.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>De <em>Qi</em> refers to a series of sensations experienced when acupuncture is performed at acupoints. De <em>Qi</em> comprises needling sensations felt by the patient, and the sensations perceived by the acupuncturist. Classical Traditional Chinese Medicine theory states that De <em>Qi</em> is closely related to curative effect. In modern studies, the main index that researchers have used to evaluate De <em>Qi</em> was the needling sensation reported by the patient. Between 1st Aug and 31st Oct 2014, we conducted an electronic database search of all fields in Chinese and English to select literature assessing acupuncture needle sensations. We then reviewed the methods used within these studies to evaluate De <em>Qi.</em> The methods included simple evaluation, and the use of a De <em>Qi</em> scale/questionnaire. The simple evaluation, a qualitative evaluation, was judged by typical sensations felt by the patient after needling at acupoints, such as soreness, numbness, fullness, and heaviness. This method was easy and practicable, and had been adopted widely by Chinese researchers. In contrast, the De <em>Qi</em> scale/questionnaire, a quantitative evaluation, had multiple compiling methods available for evaluating the intensity of De <em>Qi.</em> The standardization and objectification of the De <em>Qi</em> scale/questionnaire effectively improved the quality of studies on De <em>Qi</em>, thereby these scales/questionnaires have been acknowledged and applied by most researchers. The present review analyzed and compared the scales/questionnaires used to evaluate De <em>Qi</em>; furthermore, we provided suggestions for the development and improvement of these questionnaires through integration with classical De <em>Qi</em> theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"Pages 309-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jtcm.2017.03.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254627218302462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

De Qi refers to a series of sensations experienced when acupuncture is performed at acupoints. De Qi comprises needling sensations felt by the patient, and the sensations perceived by the acupuncturist. Classical Traditional Chinese Medicine theory states that De Qi is closely related to curative effect. In modern studies, the main index that researchers have used to evaluate De Qi was the needling sensation reported by the patient. Between 1st Aug and 31st Oct 2014, we conducted an electronic database search of all fields in Chinese and English to select literature assessing acupuncture needle sensations. We then reviewed the methods used within these studies to evaluate De Qi. The methods included simple evaluation, and the use of a De Qi scale/questionnaire. The simple evaluation, a qualitative evaluation, was judged by typical sensations felt by the patient after needling at acupoints, such as soreness, numbness, fullness, and heaviness. This method was easy and practicable, and had been adopted widely by Chinese researchers. In contrast, the De Qi scale/questionnaire, a quantitative evaluation, had multiple compiling methods available for evaluating the intensity of De Qi. The standardization and objectification of the De Qi scale/questionnaire effectively improved the quality of studies on De Qi, thereby these scales/questionnaires have been acknowledged and applied by most researchers. The present review analyzed and compared the scales/questionnaires used to evaluate De Qi; furthermore, we provided suggestions for the development and improvement of these questionnaires through integration with classical De Qi theory.

德气主观评价方法综述
德气是指针刺穴位时的一系列感觉。德气包括患者感受到的针刺感觉和针灸师感受到的针刺感觉。中医经典理论认为,德气与疗效密切相关。在现代研究中,研究者评价德气的主要指标是患者自述的针刺感。在2014年8月1日至10月31日期间,我们进行了中文和英文所有领域的电子数据库检索,以选择评估针刺针刺感觉的文献。然后,我们回顾了这些研究中用于评估德奇的方法。方法包括简单评价法和德气量表/问卷法。简单评价是一种定性评价,通过患者针刺后的典型感觉,如疼痛、麻木、充实感、沉重感来判断。该方法简便易行,已被国内研究人员广泛采用。而德气量表/问卷作为一种定量评价方法,有多种编制方法可用于德气强度的评价。德气量表/问卷的规范化和客观化,有效地提高了德气研究的质量,得到了大多数研究者的认可和应用。本综述分析比较了用于德气评价的量表/问卷;并结合经典德气理论,对问卷的开发和完善提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
32269
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine(JTCM) is devoted to clinical and theortical research on the use of acupuncture and Oriental medicine. The main columns include Clinical Observations, Basic Investigations, Reviews, Questions and Answers, an Expert''s Forum, and Discussions of Clinical Cases. Its key topics include acupuncture and electro-acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy, masseotherapy, mind-body therapies, palliative care, and other CAM therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信