Misinformation encountered during a simulated jury deliberation can distort jurors' memory of a trial and bias their verdicts

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Craig Thorley, Lara Beaton, Phillip Deguara, Brittany Jerome, Dua Khan, Kaela Schopp
{"title":"Misinformation encountered during a simulated jury deliberation can distort jurors' memory of a trial and bias their verdicts","authors":"Craig Thorley,&nbsp;Lara Beaton,&nbsp;Phillip Deguara,&nbsp;Brittany Jerome,&nbsp;Dua Khan,&nbsp;Kaela Schopp","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Jurors swear to base their verdicts solely on the evidence presented at trial. Their recall of a trial during deliberation can, however, be inaccurate, exposing other jurors to misinformation about the trial. This study examined whether jurors who are exposed to misinformation during a simulated deliberation, where the misinformation supports the prosecution's case, will misremember the misinformation as appearing during a trial and be more likely to reach a guilty verdict. It also examined whether allowing jurors to take notes during a trial, and refer to those notes throughout, stops these potentially harmful effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and twenty-four participant jurors watched a murder trial. Half were allowed to take notes. They then read a transcript of a deliberation that either contained or did not contain six pieces of pro-prosecution misinformation. Afterwards, they reached a verdict. Finally, they completed a source monitoring test that required indicating whether the misinformation, and actual trial information, appeared during the trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Jurors exposed to misinformation misremembered it as appearing during the trial. Those who misattributed the most misinformation to the trial were most likely to reach a guilty verdict. Note taking, and note access, did not stop these effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Jurors can make mistakes when recalling a trial during deliberation but the consequences of this were largely unknown. This study provides initial evidence that their mistakes may distort other jurors' recollection of the trial and bias their verdicts. Attempts to replicate these findings using live deliberations are encouraged to determine their generalizability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"25 2","pages":"150-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lcrp.12174","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

Jurors swear to base their verdicts solely on the evidence presented at trial. Their recall of a trial during deliberation can, however, be inaccurate, exposing other jurors to misinformation about the trial. This study examined whether jurors who are exposed to misinformation during a simulated deliberation, where the misinformation supports the prosecution's case, will misremember the misinformation as appearing during a trial and be more likely to reach a guilty verdict. It also examined whether allowing jurors to take notes during a trial, and refer to those notes throughout, stops these potentially harmful effects.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-four participant jurors watched a murder trial. Half were allowed to take notes. They then read a transcript of a deliberation that either contained or did not contain six pieces of pro-prosecution misinformation. Afterwards, they reached a verdict. Finally, they completed a source monitoring test that required indicating whether the misinformation, and actual trial information, appeared during the trial.

Results

Jurors exposed to misinformation misremembered it as appearing during the trial. Those who misattributed the most misinformation to the trial were most likely to reach a guilty verdict. Note taking, and note access, did not stop these effects.

Conclusions

Jurors can make mistakes when recalling a trial during deliberation but the consequences of this were largely unknown. This study provides initial evidence that their mistakes may distort other jurors' recollection of the trial and bias their verdicts. Attempts to replicate these findings using live deliberations are encouraged to determine their generalizability.

在模拟陪审团审议过程中遇到的错误信息会扭曲陪审员对审判的记忆,并使他们的判决产生偏见
目的:陪审员发誓他们的裁决完全基于审判时提供的证据。然而,他们在审议过程中对审判的回忆可能是不准确的,从而使其他陪审员接触到有关审判的错误信息。这项研究调查了陪审员在模拟审议中接触到错误信息(错误信息支持控方的案件)是否会错误地记住在审判中出现的错误信息,并更有可能做出有罪判决。它还研究了允许陪审员在审判期间做笔记,并在整个过程中参考这些笔记,是否能阻止这些潜在的有害影响。方法:124名陪审员观看了一起谋杀案的审判。一半的学生被允许做笔记。然后,他们阅读了一份审议记录,其中包含或不包含6条支持起诉的错误信息。后来他们作出了裁决。最后,他们完成了一项源监测测试,该测试要求指出在试验期间是否出现了错误信息和实际的试验信息。结果:暴露于错误信息的陪审员将其误认为是在审判期间出现的。那些将最多错误信息归咎于审判的人最有可能达成有罪判决。记笔记和访问笔记并没有阻止这些影响。结论:陪审员在审议过程中回忆审判时可能会犯错误,但其后果在很大程度上是未知的。这项研究提供了初步证据,表明他们的错误可能会扭曲其他陪审员对审判的回忆,并使他们的判决产生偏见。鼓励使用现场讨论来复制这些发现,以确定其普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信