Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Informal Logic Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI:10.22329/il.v41i3.6854

Cristina Corredor

引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper endorses a view of argumentation and arguments that relates both to a special type of speech action, namely, the performance of speech acts of arguing. Its aim is to advance an analysis of those acts that takes into account two kinds of norms related to their correct performance, namely, felicity conditions and objective requirements related to the “correspondence with the facts.” It assumes that the requirement that certain objective conditions be satisfied is among the set of felicity conditions of speech acts of arguing. Taking this into account helps clarify the position and role of warrants in the performance and assessment of these acts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

辩论言语行为中的说明文表现与客观评价

本文赞同一种论证和辩论的观点，这种观点既与一种特殊的言语行为有关，也与辩论言语行为的表现有关。它的目的是对这些行为进行分析，考虑到与正确表现相关的两种规范，即适当条件和与“与事实相符”相关的客观要求。它假设满足某些客观条件的要求是辩论言语行为的适当条件之一。考虑到这一点有助于澄清逮捕令在执行和评估这些行为中的地位和作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Informal Logic PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Informal Logic publishes articles that advance the dialectic in reasoning and argumentation theory and practice. Primary criteria for the acceptance of articles with a theoretical focus or interest are: (1) the article advances the dialectic or constitutes an interesting comment on it: it presents a cogent argument, objection, interpretation or position that is an advance in relation to the background of issues and controversies on the topic; or it casts the issue addressed in a new and worthwhile light; and (2) the article makes explicit reference to the pertinent literature on its topic, and it discharges the burden of proof imposed by that scholarship. Primary criteria for acceptance of articles devoted to the teaching of informal logic, critical thinking or argumentation include: originality; utility; timeliness; and evidence of the effectiveness of the methods, materials, technologies, etc., proposed. The standard criteria for scholarly publication—topical fit with the subjects covered in the journal; adequacy of coverage to the issue addressed; clarity, organization and literateness of the prose; conceptual clarity and cogency of argumentation—apply ceteris paribus to the selection of all articles, notes and reviews.