Forensic science and its limitations in rape and murder cases in India

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Charan, K. Manikyam
{"title":"Forensic science and its limitations in rape and murder cases in India","authors":"J. Charan, K. Manikyam","doi":"10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_98_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic science plays a significant role in crime scene analysis and other evidence collection (such as clothes, cigarette butts, blood, semen, hair, etc.,) to scientifically establish the accused's guilt. In rape and murder cases, DNA tests confirm the victim's identity. It provides certain evidence that is helpful in the speedy investigation and conclusion of a trial. However, it is not a foolproof science and it has certain limitations. Hence, the first responders, such as the Crime Laboratory Ultimate Evidence System team and the forensic experts, must keep these limitations in mind during sample collection and examination, otherwise, it may lead to incorrect results. Such incorrect results may be obtained due to insufficient sample quantity, improper collection methods, or delay in an examination. It is highly recommended to implement standard operating procedure guidelines, failing which the admissibility of such forensic evidence to prove beyond all reasonable doubts is at stake. Accordingly, the court shall acquit the accused giving him the benefit of doubt. This article focuses on the applicability and limitations of forensic science in the Indian Criminal Justice System and the need to adopt due protocols to yield viable results.","PeriodicalId":36434,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"91 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_98_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Forensic science plays a significant role in crime scene analysis and other evidence collection (such as clothes, cigarette butts, blood, semen, hair, etc.,) to scientifically establish the accused's guilt. In rape and murder cases, DNA tests confirm the victim's identity. It provides certain evidence that is helpful in the speedy investigation and conclusion of a trial. However, it is not a foolproof science and it has certain limitations. Hence, the first responders, such as the Crime Laboratory Ultimate Evidence System team and the forensic experts, must keep these limitations in mind during sample collection and examination, otherwise, it may lead to incorrect results. Such incorrect results may be obtained due to insufficient sample quantity, improper collection methods, or delay in an examination. It is highly recommended to implement standard operating procedure guidelines, failing which the admissibility of such forensic evidence to prove beyond all reasonable doubts is at stake. Accordingly, the court shall acquit the accused giving him the benefit of doubt. This article focuses on the applicability and limitations of forensic science in the Indian Criminal Justice System and the need to adopt due protocols to yield viable results.
法医学及其在印度强奸和谋杀案件中的局限性
法医科学在犯罪现场分析和其他证据收集(如衣服、烟头、血液、精液、头发等)中发挥着重要作用,科学地确立被告人的罪行。在强奸和谋杀案件中,DNA测试可以确认受害者的身份。它提供了某些证据,有助于迅速调查和结束审判。然而,这不是一门万无一失的科学,它有一定的局限性。因此,第一响应者,如犯罪实验室最终证据系统小组和法医专家,在样本收集和检查过程中必须牢记这些限制,否则可能导致错误的结果。这种不正确的结果可能是由于样品数量不足、收集方法不当或检查延误而导致的。强烈建议执行标准作业程序准则,否则这种法医证据排除一切合理怀疑的可采性就会受到威胁。因此,法院应宣告被告无罪,给予他无罪推定。本文的重点是在印度刑事司法系统法医科学的适用性和局限性,并需要采取适当的协议,以产生可行的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信