Military Culture and Institutional Trust: Evidence from Conscription Reforms in Europe

IF 5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Vincenzo Bove, Riccardo Di Leo, Marco Giani
{"title":"Military Culture and Institutional Trust: Evidence from Conscription Reforms in Europe","authors":"Vincenzo Bove,&nbsp;Riccardo Di Leo,&nbsp;Marco Giani","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does military conscription reduce the distance between the ordinary citizen and the state? Decades after its abolition, numerous European policy makers from across the political spectrum advocate the reintroduction of conscription to foster civic virtues, despite a lack of empirical evidence in this respect. Leveraging quasi-random variation in conscription reforms across 15 European countries, we find that cohorts of men drafted just before its abolition display significantly and substantially <i>lower</i> institutional trust than cohorts of men who were just exempted. At the same time, ending conscription had no effect on institutional trust among women from comparable cohorts. Results are neither driven by more favorable attitudes toward the government, nor by educational choices. Instead, this civil–military gap unfolds through the formation of a homogeneous community with uniform values. We argue that reintroducing a compulsory military service may not produce the effects anticipated by its advocates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48447,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Political Science","volume":"68 2","pages":"714-729"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajps.12745","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12745","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does military conscription reduce the distance between the ordinary citizen and the state? Decades after its abolition, numerous European policy makers from across the political spectrum advocate the reintroduction of conscription to foster civic virtues, despite a lack of empirical evidence in this respect. Leveraging quasi-random variation in conscription reforms across 15 European countries, we find that cohorts of men drafted just before its abolition display significantly and substantially lower institutional trust than cohorts of men who were just exempted. At the same time, ending conscription had no effect on institutional trust among women from comparable cohorts. Results are neither driven by more favorable attitudes toward the government, nor by educational choices. Instead, this civil–military gap unfolds through the formation of a homogeneous community with uniform values. We argue that reintroducing a compulsory military service may not produce the effects anticipated by its advocates.

Abstract Image

军事文化与制度信任:来自欧洲征兵制度改革的证据
:征兵制是否缩短了普通公民与国家之间的距离?在废除征兵制度几十年后,来自不同政治派别的众多欧洲政策制定者主张重新引入征兵制度,以培养公民美德,尽管在这方面缺乏经验证据。利用15个欧洲国家征兵改革的准随机变化,我们发现,在废除征兵制度之前被征召入伍的男性群体,其对制度的信任度明显低于刚刚被免除兵役的男性群体。与此同时,结束征兵制对来自可比群体的女性的机构信任没有影响。结果既不是由对政府更有利的态度所驱动,也不是由教育选择所驱动。相反,这种军民差距是通过形成一个具有统一价值观的同质社区而显现出来的。我们认为,重新引入义务兵役制可能不会产生其倡导者所预期的效果。验证材料:验证本文中结果、程序和分析的计算再现性所需的数据和材料可在哈佛数据厌恶网络内的美国政治科学杂志数据厌恶上获得,网址为:https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WI7WN0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) publishes research in all major areas of political science including American politics, public policy, international relations, comparative politics, political methodology, and political theory. Founded in 1956, the AJPS publishes articles that make outstanding contributions to scholarly knowledge about notable theoretical concerns, puzzles or controversies in any subfield of political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信