Examining the benefits of the build back better concept for Parisian critical infrastructures vulnerable to flooding: From build back better to build better before

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Anas Dabaj , Marc Vuillet , Frédéric Gache , Gwenaël Jouannic , Youssef Diab
{"title":"Examining the benefits of the build back better concept for Parisian critical infrastructures vulnerable to flooding: From build back better to build better before","authors":"Anas Dabaj ,&nbsp;Marc Vuillet ,&nbsp;Frédéric Gache ,&nbsp;Gwenaël Jouannic ,&nbsp;Youssef Diab","doi":"10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we propose to study the operational interest of the build back better concept (BBB) and highlighting its importance in mitigating risks and improving the resilience of critical infrastructures in the Paris region to flood risk during the recovery and the reconstruction phases. Based on an in-depth examination of the BBB concept and its relevance to risk management, we propose an adapted methodological approach suitable for the Paris Region critical infrastructures. Finally, the approach, initially designed for a reconstruction context, is implemented to reduce the vulnerabilities of infrastructures in the prevention phase. We then talk about build better before and present here a development in this sense. Our proposed framework is structured into two major axes: risk quantification and decision support for the multi-criteria optimization of the investments required to mitigate the quantified risks. With this in mind, we first propose to develop an FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) in order to identify and formalize the direct and indirect vulnerabilities of critical infrastructures in a flooding context. The output of the risk assessment is then used within a multi-criteria optimization framework for optimal risk reduction under budget constraints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37308,"journal":{"name":"Water Security","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312422000141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we propose to study the operational interest of the build back better concept (BBB) and highlighting its importance in mitigating risks and improving the resilience of critical infrastructures in the Paris region to flood risk during the recovery and the reconstruction phases. Based on an in-depth examination of the BBB concept and its relevance to risk management, we propose an adapted methodological approach suitable for the Paris Region critical infrastructures. Finally, the approach, initially designed for a reconstruction context, is implemented to reduce the vulnerabilities of infrastructures in the prevention phase. We then talk about build better before and present here a development in this sense. Our proposed framework is structured into two major axes: risk quantification and decision support for the multi-criteria optimization of the investments required to mitigate the quantified risks. With this in mind, we first propose to develop an FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) in order to identify and formalize the direct and indirect vulnerabilities of critical infrastructures in a flooding context. The output of the risk assessment is then used within a multi-criteria optimization framework for optimal risk reduction under budget constraints.

检查重建更好的概念对巴黎易受洪水影响的关键基础设施的好处:从更好的重建到更好的重建
在本文中,我们建议研究重建更好概念(BBB)的运营利益,并强调其在恢复和重建阶段减轻风险和提高巴黎地区关键基础设施抵御洪水风险的能力方面的重要性。在深入研究BBB概念及其与风险管理的相关性的基础上,我们提出了一种适合巴黎地区关键基础设施的方法。最后,该方法最初是为重建环境设计的,用于减少基础设施在预防阶段的脆弱性。然后我们讨论之前的build better,并在此展示这个意义上的发展。我们提出的框架结构分为两个主要轴:风险量化和决策支持,用于减轻量化风险所需的投资的多标准优化。考虑到这一点,我们首先建议开发FMEA(失效模式和影响分析),以便识别和形式化洪水背景下关键基础设施的直接和间接脆弱性。然后将风险评估的输出用于多准则优化框架中,以在预算约束下实现最佳风险降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Security
Water Security Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Water Security aims to publish papers that contribute to a better understanding of the economic, social, biophysical, technological, and institutional influencers of current and future global water security. At the same time the journal intends to stimulate debate, backed by science, with strong interdisciplinary connections. The goal is to publish concise and timely reviews and synthesis articles about research covering the following elements of water security: -Shortage- Flooding- Governance- Health and Sanitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信