An improved method that incorporates the estimated runoff for peak discharge prediction on the Chinese Loess Plateau

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wenhai Shi , Miaomiao Wang , Donghao Li , Xianwei Li , Mengying Sun
{"title":"An improved method that incorporates the estimated runoff for peak discharge prediction on the Chinese Loess Plateau","authors":"Wenhai Shi ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Wang ,&nbsp;Donghao Li ,&nbsp;Xianwei Li ,&nbsp;Mengying Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An accurate prediction of peak discharge in watersheds is critical not only for water resource management, but also for understanding the complex relationships of hydrological processes. In this study, a modified peak discharge formula based on the Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems (CREAMS) model was developed by introducing rainfall intensity and soil moisture factors. The reliability of the proposed method was tested with data from 1464 storm events in 41 watersheds and was applied to 256 storm events in five remaining typical watersheds using the optimized parameters. The results indicate that the proposed method is highly accurate in terms of model efficiency, as determined by Nash–Sutcliffe efficiencies (<em>NSEs</em>) of 88.60%, 74.04%, and 90.12% during the calibration, validation, and application cases, respectively. Furthermore, it performed better than the original and modified CREAMS methods. Subsequently, using the parameters derived from the initial 41 watersheds and the runoff estimated using the modified Soil Conservation Service curve number (SCS–CN) method, the proposed method was used to predict the peak discharge from the last five typical watersheds. Large <em>NSE</em> (63.88–80.83%) and low root mean square error (<em>RMSE</em>) values (0.31–35.93 m<sup>3</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>) were obtained for the five watersheds. Overall, the proposed peak discharge model, combined with the modified SCS-CN method, may accurately predict event-based peak discharge and runoff for general applications under various hydrological and geomorphic conditions in the Loess Plateau region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 290-300"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633922000740","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

An accurate prediction of peak discharge in watersheds is critical not only for water resource management, but also for understanding the complex relationships of hydrological processes. In this study, a modified peak discharge formula based on the Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems (CREAMS) model was developed by introducing rainfall intensity and soil moisture factors. The reliability of the proposed method was tested with data from 1464 storm events in 41 watersheds and was applied to 256 storm events in five remaining typical watersheds using the optimized parameters. The results indicate that the proposed method is highly accurate in terms of model efficiency, as determined by Nash–Sutcliffe efficiencies (NSEs) of 88.60%, 74.04%, and 90.12% during the calibration, validation, and application cases, respectively. Furthermore, it performed better than the original and modified CREAMS methods. Subsequently, using the parameters derived from the initial 41 watersheds and the runoff estimated using the modified Soil Conservation Service curve number (SCS–CN) method, the proposed method was used to predict the peak discharge from the last five typical watersheds. Large NSE (63.88–80.83%) and low root mean square error (RMSE) values (0.31–35.93 m3s-1) were obtained for the five watersheds. Overall, the proposed peak discharge model, combined with the modified SCS-CN method, may accurately predict event-based peak discharge and runoff for general applications under various hydrological and geomorphic conditions in the Loess Plateau region.

黄土高原洪峰流量估算方法的改进
准确预测流域洪峰流量不仅对水资源管理至关重要,而且对理解水文过程的复杂关系也至关重要。在本研究中,通过引入降雨强度和土壤水分因素,基于农业管理系统的化学品、径流和侵蚀(CREAMS)模型,开发了一个修正的峰值流量公式。使用41个流域1464次风暴事件的数据测试了所提出方法的可靠性,并使用优化参数将其应用于其余5个典型流域的256次风暴事件。结果表明,所提出的方法在模型效率方面是高度准确的,在校准、验证和应用案例中,Nash–Sutcliffe效率(NSEs)分别为88.60%、74.04%和90.12%。此外,它的性能优于原始和修改的CREAMS方法。随后,使用从最初41个流域得出的参数和使用改良土壤保持服务曲线数(SCS–CN)方法估计的径流,使用所提出的方法来预测最后五个典型流域的峰值流量。五个流域获得了较大的NSE(63.88–80.83%)和较低的均方根误差(RMSE)值(0.31–35.93 m3s-1)。总体而言,所提出的洪峰流量模型与改进的SCS-CN方法相结合,可以准确预测黄土高原地区各种水文地貌条件下基于事件的洪峰流量和径流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
International Soil and Water Conservation Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation. The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards. Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to): • Conservation models, tools, and technologies • Conservation agricultural • Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management • Land degradation • Sustainable development • Soil erosion and its control • Soil erosion processes • Water resources assessment and management • Watershed management • Soil erosion models • Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信