Sequential selections with minimization of failure

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Krzysztof J. Szajowski
{"title":"Sequential selections with minimization of failure","authors":"Krzysztof J. Szajowski","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The decision-maker (<strong>DM</strong>) sequentially evaluates up to <span><math><mi>N</mi></math></span> of different, rankable options. <strong>DM</strong> must select exactly the best one at the moment of its appearance. In the process of searching, <strong>DM</strong> finds out with each applicant whether she is the best applicant among those assessed so far (we call him a candidate). <strong>DM</strong> cannot return to rejected candidates. We discuss the psychological aspects of this selection problem, known in the literature as the secretary problem. The analysis is based on knowledge of the chances, and a subjective assessment of acceptance of the positive and negative effects <strong>DM</strong><span>’s decision. The acceptance assessment of success and failure is presented on subjective scales. We set an optimal policy that recommends analyzing applicants up to a certain point in time (a threshold time) without selecting any of them and then selecting the next encountered candidate. The determined optimal threshold depends on the level of acceptance of the positive and negative effects of the choice. This issue is discussed in the article.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002224962200061X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The decision-maker (DM) sequentially evaluates up to N of different, rankable options. DM must select exactly the best one at the moment of its appearance. In the process of searching, DM finds out with each applicant whether she is the best applicant among those assessed so far (we call him a candidate). DM cannot return to rejected candidates. We discuss the psychological aspects of this selection problem, known in the literature as the secretary problem. The analysis is based on knowledge of the chances, and a subjective assessment of acceptance of the positive and negative effects DM’s decision. The acceptance assessment of success and failure is presented on subjective scales. We set an optimal policy that recommends analyzing applicants up to a certain point in time (a threshold time) without selecting any of them and then selecting the next encountered candidate. The determined optimal threshold depends on the level of acceptance of the positive and negative effects of the choice. This issue is discussed in the article.

Abstract Image

使故障最小化的顺序选择
决策者(DM)依次评估多达N个不同的、可排序的选项。DM必须在它出现的那一刻选择最好的。在搜索的过程中,DM和每个申请人一起找出她是否是目前评估中最好的申请人(我们称他为候选人)。DM不能返回被拒绝的候选人。我们讨论了这种选择问题的心理方面,在文献中被称为秘书问题。分析是基于对机会的了解,以及对DM决策的积极和消极影响的接受程度的主观评估。成功和失败的可接受性评价是在主观尺度上提出的。我们设置了一个最优策略,建议在某个时间点(阈值时间)之前分析申请人,不选择其中任何一个,然后选择下一个遇到的候选人。确定的最佳阈值取决于对选择的积极和消极影响的接受程度。本文讨论了这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信