YouTube as an Information Resource for Persons Interested in Septoplasty and/or Turbinoplasty.

Journal of Rhinology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-27 DOI:10.18787/jr.2021.00391
Chang Yeong Jeong, Il Hwan Lee, Do Hyun Kim, Sung Won Kim, Soo Whan Kim
{"title":"YouTube as an Information Resource for Persons Interested in Septoplasty and/or Turbinoplasty.","authors":"Chang Yeong Jeong, Il Hwan Lee, Do Hyun Kim, Sung Won Kim, Soo Whan Kim","doi":"10.18787/jr.2021.00391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>YouTube is a widely used web site. In general, many people search for medical information on YouTube. We evaluated the septoplasty and turbinoplasty videos on YouTube from an expert's point of view.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used \"septoplasty,\" \"turbinoplasty,\" and \"septoplasty turbinoplasty\" to search YouTube. Of the 150 videos, we eventually viewed 83. Two researchers assessed the sources, lengths, and numbers of likes, dislikes, and views. The videos were classified as \"excellent,\" \"moderate,\" or \"poor\" in terms of utility; we also evaluated the uploaded material and content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 83 videos, 18 (21.7%) were excellent, 27 (32.5%) were moderate, and 38 (45.8%) were poor. We found no significant differences in length and mean likes, dislikes, and views between the groups classified as useful. Fifteen (39.5%) of 38 poor videos were by patients, and 13 (34.2%) of 38 poor videos were by physicians. When organized by content type, videos on personal experiences were significantly longer than the others. Of 20 videos on personal experiences, 15 (75%) were poor and all 5 advertisement videos (100%) were poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Information from YouTube on septoplasty and turbinoplasty is not yet adequate. However, since YouTube content cannot be controlled, it is necessary to upload objective and accurate videos for patients and experts in professional groups such as the medical society. Such videos should be promoted and used actively.</p>","PeriodicalId":33935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"76-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2021.00391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: YouTube is a widely used web site. In general, many people search for medical information on YouTube. We evaluated the septoplasty and turbinoplasty videos on YouTube from an expert's point of view.

Methods: We used "septoplasty," "turbinoplasty," and "septoplasty turbinoplasty" to search YouTube. Of the 150 videos, we eventually viewed 83. Two researchers assessed the sources, lengths, and numbers of likes, dislikes, and views. The videos were classified as "excellent," "moderate," or "poor" in terms of utility; we also evaluated the uploaded material and content.

Results: Of the 83 videos, 18 (21.7%) were excellent, 27 (32.5%) were moderate, and 38 (45.8%) were poor. We found no significant differences in length and mean likes, dislikes, and views between the groups classified as useful. Fifteen (39.5%) of 38 poor videos were by patients, and 13 (34.2%) of 38 poor videos were by physicians. When organized by content type, videos on personal experiences were significantly longer than the others. Of 20 videos on personal experiences, 15 (75%) were poor and all 5 advertisement videos (100%) were poor.

Conclusion: Information from YouTube on septoplasty and turbinoplasty is not yet adequate. However, since YouTube content cannot be controlled, it is necessary to upload objective and accurate videos for patients and experts in professional groups such as the medical society. Such videos should be promoted and used actively.

YouTube作为对鼻中隔成形术和/或鼻翼成形术感兴趣的人的信息资源
背景和目的:YouTube是一个被广泛使用的网站。一般来说,很多人在YouTube上搜索医疗信息。我们从专家的角度评估了YouTube上的鼻中隔成形术和鼻甲成形术视频。方法:我们使用“鼻中隔成形术”、“鼻中隔成形术”和“鼻中隔成形术”搜索YouTube。在150个视频中,我们最终看了83个。两名研究人员评估了喜欢、不喜欢和观点的来源、长度和数量。根据实用性,这些视频被分为“优秀”、“中等”和“差”三个等级;我们还对上传的材料和内容进行了评估。结果:83份录像中,优18份(21.7%),中27份(32.5%),差38份(45.8%)。我们发现,在分类为有用的组之间,长度和平均喜欢、不喜欢和观点没有显著差异。38个不良视频中有15个(39.5%)是患者拍摄的,13个(34.2%)是医生拍摄的。当按内容类型组织时,关于个人经历的视频明显比其他视频长。在20个关于个人体验的视频中,有15个(75%)是差的,5个广告片(100%)都是差的。结论:YouTube上关于鼻中隔成形术和鼻甲成形术的信息尚不充分。但是,由于YouTube的内容无法控制,因此有必要为患者和医学学会等专业团体的专家上传客观准确的视频。应积极推广和利用这类视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信