Reimagining Language Proficiency Assessment for English Learners with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sunaina Shenoy, J. S. de Valenzuela, Rosalía Pacheco
{"title":"Reimagining Language Proficiency Assessment for English Learners with Significant Cognitive Disabilities","authors":"Sunaina Shenoy, J. S. de Valenzuela, Rosalía Pacheco","doi":"10.1177/15407969221119137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language proficiency assessment (LPA) serves as a gatekeeper to accessing language services for English learners (ELs) with and without disabilities. Moreover, research suggests that EL services are often deemphasized compared with special education services for students with significant cognitive disabilities (SCDs). We highlight the intersectional nature of educational inequities faced by ELs with SCDs by briefly examining the implications of current legal requirements and offering a critique of LPAs, particularly those designed for students with SCDs. The difficulty of identifying the relative contributions of both limited English proficiency and disability to perceived deficits in English language proficiency is especially salient for students with SCDs, as their communication challenges may be misunderstood as primarily stemming from their underlying disability. This issue raises concerns about how English language proficiency should be understood for ELs with SCDs. A failure to understand this in turn may lead to inaccurate results in diagnostic testing, in addition to inequitable access to appropriate EL services. Finally, a case is made for alternative processes that could increase access to appropriate educational programs and foster increased educational equity.","PeriodicalId":47213,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","volume":"47 1","pages":"176 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221119137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language proficiency assessment (LPA) serves as a gatekeeper to accessing language services for English learners (ELs) with and without disabilities. Moreover, research suggests that EL services are often deemphasized compared with special education services for students with significant cognitive disabilities (SCDs). We highlight the intersectional nature of educational inequities faced by ELs with SCDs by briefly examining the implications of current legal requirements and offering a critique of LPAs, particularly those designed for students with SCDs. The difficulty of identifying the relative contributions of both limited English proficiency and disability to perceived deficits in English language proficiency is especially salient for students with SCDs, as their communication challenges may be misunderstood as primarily stemming from their underlying disability. This issue raises concerns about how English language proficiency should be understood for ELs with SCDs. A failure to understand this in turn may lead to inaccurate results in diagnostic testing, in addition to inequitable access to appropriate EL services. Finally, a case is made for alternative processes that could increase access to appropriate educational programs and foster increased educational equity.
重塑有严重认知障碍的英语学习者的语言能力评估
语言能力评估(LPA)为残疾和非残疾的英语学习者提供语言服务。此外,研究表明,与为有严重认知障碍(SCD)的学生提供的特殊教育服务相比,EL服务往往没有得到重视。我们通过简要审查当前法律要求的影响,并对LPA,特别是为SCD学生设计的LPA进行批评,强调了ELs面临的教育不平等的交叉性。对于患有SCD的学生来说,很难确定有限的英语水平和残疾对英语语言能力缺陷的相对贡献,因为他们的沟通挑战可能被误解为主要源于他们潜在的残疾。这一问题引发了人们对患有SCD的ELs应如何理解英语水平的担忧。如果不理解这一点,除了不公平地获得适当的EL服务外,还可能导致诊断测试结果不准确。最后,提出了一个替代程序的案例,该程序可以增加获得适当教育计划的机会,并促进教育公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信