Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms influencing acute to chronic postsurgical pain transitions in pediatrics: Preclinical to clinical evidence.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Adam J Dourson, Adam Willits, Namrata G R Raut, Leena Kader, Erin Young, Michael P Jankowski, Vidya Chidambaran
{"title":"Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms influencing acute to chronic postsurgical pain transitions in pediatrics: Preclinical to clinical evidence.","authors":"Adam J Dourson, Adam Willits, Namrata G R Raut, Leena Kader, Erin Young, Michael P Jankowski, Vidya Chidambaran","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2021.2021799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in children remains an important problem with no effective preventive or therapeutic strategies. Recently, genomic underpinnings explaining additional interindividual risk beyond psychological factors have been proposed.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We present a comprehensive review of current preclinical and clinical evidence for genetic and epigenetic mechanisms relevant to pediatric CPSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Animal models are relevant to translational research for unraveling genomic mechanisms. For example, <i>Cacng2, p2rx7</i>, and <i>bdnf</i> mutant mice show altered mechanical hypersensitivity to injury, and variants of the same genes have been associated with CPSP susceptibility in humans; similarly, differential DNA methylation (<i>H1SP</i>) and miRNAs (miR-96/7a) have shown translational implications. Animal studies also suggest that crosstalk between neurons and immune cells may be involved in nociceptive priming observed in neonates. In children, differential DNA methylation in regulatory genomic regions enriching GABAergic, dopaminergic, and immune pathways, as well as polygenic risk scores for enhanced prediction of CPSP, have been described. Genome-wide studies in pediatric CPSP are scarce, but pathways identified by adult gene association studies point to potential common mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bench-to-bedside genomics research in pediatric CPSP is currently limited. Reverse translational approaches, use of other -omics, and inclusion of pediatric/CPSP endophenotypes in large-scale biobanks may be potential solutions. Time of developmental vulnerability and longitudinal genomic changes after surgery warrant further investigation. Emergence of promising precision pain management strategies based on gene editing and epigenetic programing emphasize need for further research in pediatric CPSP-related genomics.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"6 1","pages":"85-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2021.2021799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in children remains an important problem with no effective preventive or therapeutic strategies. Recently, genomic underpinnings explaining additional interindividual risk beyond psychological factors have been proposed.

Aims: We present a comprehensive review of current preclinical and clinical evidence for genetic and epigenetic mechanisms relevant to pediatric CPSP.

Methods: Narrative review.

Results: Animal models are relevant to translational research for unraveling genomic mechanisms. For example, Cacng2, p2rx7, and bdnf mutant mice show altered mechanical hypersensitivity to injury, and variants of the same genes have been associated with CPSP susceptibility in humans; similarly, differential DNA methylation (H1SP) and miRNAs (miR-96/7a) have shown translational implications. Animal studies also suggest that crosstalk between neurons and immune cells may be involved in nociceptive priming observed in neonates. In children, differential DNA methylation in regulatory genomic regions enriching GABAergic, dopaminergic, and immune pathways, as well as polygenic risk scores for enhanced prediction of CPSP, have been described. Genome-wide studies in pediatric CPSP are scarce, but pathways identified by adult gene association studies point to potential common mechanisms.

Conclusions: Bench-to-bedside genomics research in pediatric CPSP is currently limited. Reverse translational approaches, use of other -omics, and inclusion of pediatric/CPSP endophenotypes in large-scale biobanks may be potential solutions. Time of developmental vulnerability and longitudinal genomic changes after surgery warrant further investigation. Emergence of promising precision pain management strategies based on gene editing and epigenetic programing emphasize need for further research in pediatric CPSP-related genomics.

影响儿科手术后急性到慢性疼痛转变的遗传和表观遗传机制:临床前到临床证据
摘要背景儿童慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)仍然是一个重要问题,没有有效的预防或治疗策略。最近,有人提出了解释心理因素之外的额外个体间风险的基因组基础。目的:我们对目前与儿童CPSP相关的遗传和表观遗传学机制的临床前和临床证据进行了全面综述。方法叙述性回顾。结果动物模型与揭示基因组机制的转化研究相关。例如,Cacng2、p2rx7和bdnf突变小鼠对损伤表现出改变的机械超敏反应,并且相同基因的变体与人类的CPSP易感性有关;类似地,差异DNA甲基化(H1SP)和miRNA(miR-96/7a)已经显示出翻译意义。动物研究还表明,在新生儿中观察到的伤害性启动可能与神经元和免疫细胞之间的串扰有关。在儿童中,已经描述了富含GABA能、多巴胺能和免疫途径的调节基因组区域的差异DNA甲基化,以及用于增强CPSP预测的多基因风险评分。儿科CPSP的全基因组研究很少,但成人基因关联研究确定的途径指出了潜在的共同机制。结论儿童CPSP的台旁基因组学研究目前是有限的。反向翻译方法、使用其他组学以及将儿科/CSP内表型纳入大规模生物库可能是潜在的解决方案。手术后发育脆弱性的时间和纵向基因组变化值得进一步研究。基于基因编辑和表观遗传学编程的有前景的精确疼痛管理策略的出现强调了对儿童CPSP相关基因组学的进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信