A participatory approach to map strategic areas for conservation and restoration at a regional scale

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Luara Tourinho , Sara Maria de Brito Alves , Felipe Bastos Lobo da Silva , Marcio Verdi , Nádia Roque , Abel Augusto Conceição , Lidyanne Y.S. Aona , Guilherme de Oliveira , Alessandra Nasser Caiafa , Dary M.G. Rigueira , Tiago Jordão Porto , Ricardo Dobrovolski , Bruno Vilela
{"title":"A participatory approach to map strategic areas for conservation and restoration at a regional scale","authors":"Luara Tourinho ,&nbsp;Sara Maria de Brito Alves ,&nbsp;Felipe Bastos Lobo da Silva ,&nbsp;Marcio Verdi ,&nbsp;Nádia Roque ,&nbsp;Abel Augusto Conceição ,&nbsp;Lidyanne Y.S. Aona ,&nbsp;Guilherme de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Alessandra Nasser Caiafa ,&nbsp;Dary M.G. Rigueira ,&nbsp;Tiago Jordão Porto ,&nbsp;Ricardo Dobrovolski ,&nbsp;Bruno Vilela","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying and mapping strategic areas for conservation and restoration actions are essential initiatives to reduce human impact on biodiversity. However, most spatial prioritization does not involve decision-makers and stakeholders, generating a science-application gap. Here, we describe a participatory framework to map strategic areas for conservation of 27 species and their ecosystems (SASC), and strategic areas for ecosystem restoration (SAER) in a highly diverse region of Bahia, Brazil. We had eleven participatory meetings where scientists, decision-makers and stakeholders discussed and agreed with the project and methodology. The participants chose five prioritization criteria: habitat amount, environmental suitability, fire frequency, permanently protected area amount and diversity of phytophysiognomies, in this order of relevance. We generated technical maps based on these criteria, which were adjusted to 11 SASC and 12 SAER, according to participants’ perspectives. Many decisions taken during this process would hardly be taken in a conventional academic prioritization process, as some demands arose from participants. These maps are the first step for many posterior conservation actions (e.g. reducing agricultural impacts and species trade), therefore, the results were made accessible to the general public. This process provided participants a sense of ownership of the knowledge, as they became active agents in the process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 52-61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064422000748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Identifying and mapping strategic areas for conservation and restoration actions are essential initiatives to reduce human impact on biodiversity. However, most spatial prioritization does not involve decision-makers and stakeholders, generating a science-application gap. Here, we describe a participatory framework to map strategic areas for conservation of 27 species and their ecosystems (SASC), and strategic areas for ecosystem restoration (SAER) in a highly diverse region of Bahia, Brazil. We had eleven participatory meetings where scientists, decision-makers and stakeholders discussed and agreed with the project and methodology. The participants chose five prioritization criteria: habitat amount, environmental suitability, fire frequency, permanently protected area amount and diversity of phytophysiognomies, in this order of relevance. We generated technical maps based on these criteria, which were adjusted to 11 SASC and 12 SAER, according to participants’ perspectives. Many decisions taken during this process would hardly be taken in a conventional academic prioritization process, as some demands arose from participants. These maps are the first step for many posterior conservation actions (e.g. reducing agricultural impacts and species trade), therefore, the results were made accessible to the general public. This process provided participants a sense of ownership of the knowledge, as they became active agents in the process.

Abstract Image

采用参与式方法绘制区域范围内的保护和修复战略区域
确定和绘制保护和恢复行动的战略领域是减少人类对生物多样性影响的重要举措。然而,大多数空间优先排序没有涉及决策者和利益相关者,从而产生科学应用差距。在这里,我们描述了一个参与式框架,用于绘制巴西巴伊亚高度多样化地区27种物种及其生态系统保护战略区域(SASC)和生态系统恢复战略区域(SAER)。我们举行了11次参与性会议,科学家、决策者和利益相关者讨论并同意项目和方法。参与者选择了五个优先级标准:栖息地数量、环境适宜性、火灾频率、永久保护区数量和植物地貌多样性。我们根据这些标准生成了技术地图,根据参与者的观点,这些标准被调整为11个SASC和12个SAER。在这个过程中做出的许多决定很难在传统的学术优先排序过程中做出,因为参与者提出了一些要求。这些地图是许多后续保护行动(例如减少农业影响和物种贸易)的第一步,因此,结果向公众开放。这个过程为参与者提供了一种知识的所有权感,因为他们在这个过程中成为了积极的行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信