Exploring issues in categorisation of higher music education courses through FOI surveys of gender demographics in UK higher education institutions

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Tatlow
{"title":"Exploring issues in categorisation of higher music education courses through FOI surveys of gender demographics in UK higher education institutions","authors":"S. Tatlow","doi":"10.1017/S0265051722000249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A common conclusion drawn from publicly available Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) data releases is that Higher Music Education (HME) courses have a predominantly male population. However, HESA data has key issues when examining HME courses: which courses are reported as ‘music’ courses to HESA; how do universities decide which courses are ‘music’ courses; how many different topics are contained within the umbrella of ‘music’ courses? To address questions of gender representation in HME, universities in the UK were approached with Freedom of Information Act requests for the gender demographics of student populations on “music-related” courses. Information was gained on 3456 courses populations between 2014 and 2020, which was categorised by the subject of study. Six core undergraduate topics were identified: generic music degrees (female bias), degrees combining music and technology (male bias), degrees combining music and business (no gender bias), degrees on popular music (male bias), degrees combining music and theatre (female bias) and major conservatoire courses (no gender bias). No area was accurately represented by HESA data, and gender representation varied significantly between areas. These findings have implications for discussions of gender representation in HME across the UK.","PeriodicalId":54192,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Music Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051722000249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A common conclusion drawn from publicly available Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) data releases is that Higher Music Education (HME) courses have a predominantly male population. However, HESA data has key issues when examining HME courses: which courses are reported as ‘music’ courses to HESA; how do universities decide which courses are ‘music’ courses; how many different topics are contained within the umbrella of ‘music’ courses? To address questions of gender representation in HME, universities in the UK were approached with Freedom of Information Act requests for the gender demographics of student populations on “music-related” courses. Information was gained on 3456 courses populations between 2014 and 2020, which was categorised by the subject of study. Six core undergraduate topics were identified: generic music degrees (female bias), degrees combining music and technology (male bias), degrees combining music and business (no gender bias), degrees on popular music (male bias), degrees combining music and theatre (female bias) and major conservatoire courses (no gender bias). No area was accurately represented by HESA data, and gender representation varied significantly between areas. These findings have implications for discussions of gender representation in HME across the UK.
通过《信息自由法》对英国高等教育机构性别人口统计的调查,探讨高等音乐教育课程分类问题
从公开的高等教育统计局(HESA)数据中得出的一个共同结论是,高等音乐教育(HME)课程的主要人群是男性。然而,在检查HME课程时,HESA的数据存在关键问题:哪些课程被报告为HESA的“音乐”课程;大学如何决定哪些课程是“音乐”课程;“音乐”课程中包含了多少不同的主题?为了解决HME中的性别代表性问题,英国大学收到了《信息自由法》的要求,要求提供“音乐相关”课程学生群体的性别人口统计数据。2014年至2020年间,获得了3456个课程人群的信息,这些人群按研究主题进行了分类。确定了六个核心本科生主题:普通音乐学位(女性偏见)、音乐与技术相结合的学位(男性偏见)、艺术与商业相结合的学历(无性别偏见)、流行音乐学位(男性偏好)、音乐和戏剧相结合的学度(女性偏见和主要音乐学院课程(无性别歧视)。HESA的数据没有准确地代表任何地区,不同地区的性别代表性差异很大。这些发现对英国HME中性别代表性的讨论具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信