Teacher educators’ experiences of the shift to remote teaching and learning due to COVID-19

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sven H. Glietenberg, N. Petersen, A. Carolin
{"title":"Teacher educators’ experiences of the shift to remote teaching and learning due to COVID-19","authors":"Sven H. Glietenberg, N. Petersen, A. Carolin","doi":"10.4102/sajce.v12i1.1189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The measures imposed to curb the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in early 2020 meant that many higher education institutions (HEIs) had to shift rapidly to remote teaching and learning (RTL). Given the unique demands of teacher education programmes, the question of the extent to which RTL and similar modes of teaching and learning are suited to the preparation of primary school teachers to teach in South African schools is an important one.Aim: The aim of the study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of teacher educators (TEs) towards this rapid shift to RTL.Setting: The study took place in one department in a faculty of education in an urban South African university.Methods: This study took the form of a qualitative case study. Data was gathered by means semistructured individual interviews and focus group discussions.Results: Firstly, it was found that mixed responses to the change to RTL at the outset gave way to a general consensus about the long-term value of blended learning. Secondly, it was found that the change to RTL had a positive effect on TEs’ teaching, given increased familiarity with, and integration of, technology, as well as the accompanying revisions to both pedagogy and curricula. Thirdly, the data showed that TEs perceived RTL as limiting because of two main factors, namely students’ lack of information and communication technology (ICT) resources and because, in their estimation, teacher education uniquely requires contact teaching. Finally, it was found that the change to RTL created additional psychological stressors for both students and staff.Conclusion: Based on this study’s findings, the authors advocate for more recognition and support for the emotional work performed by TEs during times of transition. They also argue that TEs should be given more responsibility in moulding blended teaching and learning practices according to their experiences of the successes and challenges of RTL.","PeriodicalId":55958,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v12i1.1189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The measures imposed to curb the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in early 2020 meant that many higher education institutions (HEIs) had to shift rapidly to remote teaching and learning (RTL). Given the unique demands of teacher education programmes, the question of the extent to which RTL and similar modes of teaching and learning are suited to the preparation of primary school teachers to teach in South African schools is an important one.Aim: The aim of the study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of teacher educators (TEs) towards this rapid shift to RTL.Setting: The study took place in one department in a faculty of education in an urban South African university.Methods: This study took the form of a qualitative case study. Data was gathered by means semistructured individual interviews and focus group discussions.Results: Firstly, it was found that mixed responses to the change to RTL at the outset gave way to a general consensus about the long-term value of blended learning. Secondly, it was found that the change to RTL had a positive effect on TEs’ teaching, given increased familiarity with, and integration of, technology, as well as the accompanying revisions to both pedagogy and curricula. Thirdly, the data showed that TEs perceived RTL as limiting because of two main factors, namely students’ lack of information and communication technology (ICT) resources and because, in their estimation, teacher education uniquely requires contact teaching. Finally, it was found that the change to RTL created additional psychological stressors for both students and staff.Conclusion: Based on this study’s findings, the authors advocate for more recognition and support for the emotional work performed by TEs during times of transition. They also argue that TEs should be given more responsibility in moulding blended teaching and learning practices according to their experiences of the successes and challenges of RTL.
教师教育工作者在新冠肺炎疫情下转向远程教学的经验
背景:2020年初实施的遏制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的措施意味着许多高等教育机构(HEIs)不得不迅速转向远程教学(RTL)。鉴于教师教育方案的独特要求,劳教和类似的教学模式在多大程度上适合于培养在南非学校任教的小学教师的问题是一个重要问题。目的:本研究的目的是探讨教师教育工作者(te)对这种快速转向RTL的经验和看法。环境:这项研究在南非一所城市大学的教育学院的一个部门进行。方法:本研究采用定性个案研究的形式。通过半结构化的个人访谈和焦点小组讨论收集数据。结果:首先,我们发现一开始对RTL改变的混合反应让位于对混合学习的长期价值的普遍共识。其次,研究发现,由于对技术的熟悉程度和整合程度的提高,以及对教学法和课程的相应修订,RTL的变化对TEs的教学产生了积极影响。第三,数据显示,教师认为RTL是有限的,主要有两个因素,即学生缺乏信息和通信技术(ICT)资源,因为在他们看来,教师教育独特地需要接触教学。最后,我们发现劳教的改变对学生和工作人员都产生了额外的心理压力。结论:基于本研究的发现,作者主张对TEs在过渡时期所做的情感工作给予更多的认可和支持。他们还认为,教师应根据他们在RTL的成功和挑战方面的经验,在塑造混合式教与学实践方面承担更多责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Childhood Education
South African Journal of Childhood Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信