Statistical Analysis and Countermeasures for Specimen Rejection in the Emergency Department

Yinhua Fan, Bo-cheng Zhao
{"title":"Statistical Analysis and Countermeasures for Specimen Rejection in the Emergency Department","authors":"Yinhua Fan, Bo-cheng Zhao","doi":"10.26689/jcnr.v7i4.5137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rejected specimens from the Emergency Department of the Center of Clinical Laboratory from January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 were analyzed to reduce the specimen rejection rates and to improve the quality of inspection. The results showed that there were 1488 samples of rejected specimens and the non-conforming rate was 0.58%. The departments involved were mainly the Emergency Department, the Hematology Department, the Cardiology Department, the Intensive Care Department, and the Brain Surgery Department. Among the reasons for rejection, blood hemolysis accounted for 43.15%, blood coagulation accounted for 26.61%, and the rate of insufficient specimens was 17.14%. Among them, the sample rejection rate for arterial blood gas analysis was the highest, which accounted for 1.74%; followed by specimens for coagulation test, which was 1.18%. These results indicate the main reason for producing rejected specimens is mainly due to not following the standard operating procedure. Specimen rejection can largely be avoided if the standards for specimen collection are strictly followed.","PeriodicalId":64151,"journal":{"name":"临床护理研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床护理研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v7i4.5137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rejected specimens from the Emergency Department of the Center of Clinical Laboratory from January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 were analyzed to reduce the specimen rejection rates and to improve the quality of inspection. The results showed that there were 1488 samples of rejected specimens and the non-conforming rate was 0.58%. The departments involved were mainly the Emergency Department, the Hematology Department, the Cardiology Department, the Intensive Care Department, and the Brain Surgery Department. Among the reasons for rejection, blood hemolysis accounted for 43.15%, blood coagulation accounted for 26.61%, and the rate of insufficient specimens was 17.14%. Among them, the sample rejection rate for arterial blood gas analysis was the highest, which accounted for 1.74%; followed by specimens for coagulation test, which was 1.18%. These results indicate the main reason for producing rejected specimens is mainly due to not following the standard operating procedure. Specimen rejection can largely be avoided if the standards for specimen collection are strictly followed.
急诊科标本拒收的统计分析及对策
对2022年1月1日至2023年1月31日来自临床检验中心急诊科的拒收标本进行分析,以降低标本拒收率,提高检验质量。结果显示,共有1488份拒收标本,不合格率为0.58%,涉及科室主要为急诊科、血液科、心内科、重症监护科、脑外科。排异原因中,血液溶血占43.15%,凝血占26.61%,标本不足率17.14%,其中动脉血气分析的标本排异率最高,占1.74%;其次是混凝试验样品,占1.18%。这些结果表明,产生不合格样品的主要原因是没有遵循标准操作程序。如果严格遵守样本采集标准,可以在很大程度上避免样本拒收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信