When the Campus is the Locker Room: A Queer Analysis of Student Athletics Bias Incidents

Q2 Social Sciences
N. Havey
{"title":"When the Campus is the Locker Room: A Queer Analysis of Student Athletics Bias Incidents","authors":"N. Havey","doi":"10.1080/26379112.2021.1950740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This multiple case study analyzes institutional responses to sex and gender bias incidents in student athletics programs and messaging around inclusion and antidiscrimination between 2015 and 2019. This study seeks to uncover, understand, and work to transform the embedded institutional values that harm sex and gender minority (SGM) students on college campuses and in student athletics by investigating three cases at Canisius College, Columbia University, and Harvard University. These cases were chosen due to their active athletics cultures and high-profile incidents involving SGM students. Analysis indicates that institutions are likely to: (a) limit their responsibility for bias incidents; (b) individualize discriminatory behavior to the perpetrators, ignoring embedded institutional cultures; and (c) reiterate “zero tolerance” while failing to enact any material change for the SGM students harmed by both the incidents in question and the institutions’ vague and toothless policies. Institutions must commit to materially support students through proactive measures rather than relying on nominal and reactive action that only further serves to exacerbate discrimination.","PeriodicalId":36686,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"187 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2021.1950740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This multiple case study analyzes institutional responses to sex and gender bias incidents in student athletics programs and messaging around inclusion and antidiscrimination between 2015 and 2019. This study seeks to uncover, understand, and work to transform the embedded institutional values that harm sex and gender minority (SGM) students on college campuses and in student athletics by investigating three cases at Canisius College, Columbia University, and Harvard University. These cases were chosen due to their active athletics cultures and high-profile incidents involving SGM students. Analysis indicates that institutions are likely to: (a) limit their responsibility for bias incidents; (b) individualize discriminatory behavior to the perpetrators, ignoring embedded institutional cultures; and (c) reiterate “zero tolerance” while failing to enact any material change for the SGM students harmed by both the incidents in question and the institutions’ vague and toothless policies. Institutions must commit to materially support students through proactive measures rather than relying on nominal and reactive action that only further serves to exacerbate discrimination.
当校园是更衣室:学生体育偏见事件的再分析
这项多案例研究分析了2015年至2019年间,学校对学生体育项目中的性和性别偏见事件的反应,以及围绕包容和反歧视的信息。本研究通过调查卡尼修斯学院、哥伦比亚大学和哈佛大学的三个案例,试图揭示、理解并努力转变在大学校园和学生体育运动中伤害性和性别少数群体(SGM)学生的根深蒂固的制度价值观。选择这些案例是因为他们活跃的体育文化和涉及SGM学生的高调事件。分析表明,各机构可能:(a)限制其对偏见事件的责任;(b) 将对犯罪者的歧视行为个人化,忽视根深蒂固的制度文化;以及(c)重申“零容忍”,同时没有对因相关事件和各机构模糊且没有效力的政策而受到伤害的SGM学生做出任何实质性改变。各院校必须承诺通过积极主动的措施为学生提供物质支持,而不是依靠名义上的被动行动,这只会进一步加剧歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education
Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信