The limits of mutual benefit: A neo-mercantilist perspective on China’s economic relations with Nigeria

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
T. Amusan, P. Nel
{"title":"The limits of mutual benefit: A neo-mercantilist perspective on China’s economic relations with Nigeria","authors":"T. Amusan, P. Nel","doi":"10.1080/10220461.2023.2207557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What is the best term to describe China’s global geo-economic strategy? This article posits that neo-mercantilism accurately describes China’s global geo-economic strategy. Neo-mercantilism, which has a long history in Chinese thought, is a strategy of state-building that combines liberal and protectionist means to enhance the relative position of the state and its political elite. In contrast to mercantilism, this strategy is not exclusively zero-sum in that it also facilitates the selective developmental needs of targeted states. However, the actual relative gains made by a neo-mercantilist power are larger than those of the target state. Nigeria is a regional economic powerhouse with large natural-resource rents and extensive development needs, making it a prime destination for Chinese neo-mercantilist engagement. While Chinese engagement serves some of the immediate developmental needs of Nigeria, the bottom line is that China gains considerably more from its engagement with Nigeria than vice versa.","PeriodicalId":44641,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","volume":"30 1","pages":"121 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2207557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT What is the best term to describe China’s global geo-economic strategy? This article posits that neo-mercantilism accurately describes China’s global geo-economic strategy. Neo-mercantilism, which has a long history in Chinese thought, is a strategy of state-building that combines liberal and protectionist means to enhance the relative position of the state and its political elite. In contrast to mercantilism, this strategy is not exclusively zero-sum in that it also facilitates the selective developmental needs of targeted states. However, the actual relative gains made by a neo-mercantilist power are larger than those of the target state. Nigeria is a regional economic powerhouse with large natural-resource rents and extensive development needs, making it a prime destination for Chinese neo-mercantilist engagement. While Chinese engagement serves some of the immediate developmental needs of Nigeria, the bottom line is that China gains considerably more from its engagement with Nigeria than vice versa.
互利的界限:中国与尼日利亚经济关系的新重商主义视角
摘要用什么来形容中国的全球地缘经济战略最好?本文认为,新重商主义准确地描述了中国的全球地缘经济战略。新重商主义在中国思想中有着悠久的历史,它是一种结合自由主义和保护主义手段来提高国家及其政治精英的相对地位的国家建设战略。与重商主义相反,这一战略并不完全是零和战略,因为它还促进了目标国家的选择性发展需求。然而,一个新重商主义大国所取得的实际相对收益要大于目标国家。尼日利亚是一个地区经济大国,拥有大量自然资源租金和广泛的发展需求,是中国新重商主义参与的主要目的地。虽然中国的参与满足了尼日利亚的一些直接发展需求,但底线是,中国从与尼日利亚的接触中获得的收益远大于尼日利亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信