Eradication programs against non-native pests and pathogens of woody plants in Europe: which factors influence their success or failure?

IF 3.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Neobiota Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.3897/neobiota.84.95687
S. Branco, J. Douma, E. Brockerhoff, Mireia Gómez-Gallego, B. Marçais, S. Prospero, J. C. Franco, H. Jactel, M. Branco
{"title":"Eradication programs against non-native pests and pathogens of woody plants in Europe: which factors influence their success or failure?","authors":"S. Branco, J. Douma, E. Brockerhoff, Mireia Gómez-Gallego, B. Marçais, S. Prospero, J. C. Franco, H. Jactel, M. Branco","doi":"10.3897/neobiota.84.95687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When a non-native species succeeds in establishing in a new habitat, one of the possible responses is to attempt its eradication. In the present study, we analysed European eradication programmes against non-native pests and pathogens of woody plants (PPWP) from 1945 to date. Our main goal was to identify which factors affect the success of an eradication programme, reinforcing guidelines for future eradication of PPWP. Data on eradication campaigns were obtained from online databases, scientific and grey literature, and Plant Protection Organizations’ reports. Factors influencing eradication success for both arthropods and pathogens were analysed with LASSO regression and decision tree learning.\n A total of 848 cases officially declared as eradication attempts were documented in our database (8-fold higher than previous reports). Both the number of programmes and their rate of success increased sharply over the last two decades. Only less than 10% of the non-native organisms affecting woody plants were targeted for attempted eradication despite the high economic and ecological impacts caused by some species for which no efforts were undertaken. Almost one-third of the officially declared cases of eradication concerned organisms that were still restricted to the material with which they were introduced. For these cases the success rate was 100%. The success rate of established species was only 50% for arthropods and 61% for pathogens. The spatial extent of the outbreak was the factor that most affected the outcome of eradication campaigns. The eradication success decreased abruptly above 100 ha for arthropods and 10 ha for pathogens. Additionally, other variables were shown to influence the outcome of eradication programmes, in particular the type of environment, with the highest eradication success rate found in nurseries and glasshouses, with successful outcomes increasing if quarantine measures were applied and when monitoring included asymptomatic plants. Particular species traits may reduce eradication success: parthenogenetic arthropods, saprotrophic pathogens, wind dispersal, the possibility to remain asymptomatic indefinitely, and the existence of resting spores or stages.\n In conclusion, small affected areas, quick response, and efficient implementation of quarantine restrictions, together with particular species traits, may allow a high probability of eradication success. Preparedness at the country and European level would allow a larger number of target species to be included in future eradication programmes.","PeriodicalId":54290,"journal":{"name":"Neobiota","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neobiota","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.84.95687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When a non-native species succeeds in establishing in a new habitat, one of the possible responses is to attempt its eradication. In the present study, we analysed European eradication programmes against non-native pests and pathogens of woody plants (PPWP) from 1945 to date. Our main goal was to identify which factors affect the success of an eradication programme, reinforcing guidelines for future eradication of PPWP. Data on eradication campaigns were obtained from online databases, scientific and grey literature, and Plant Protection Organizations’ reports. Factors influencing eradication success for both arthropods and pathogens were analysed with LASSO regression and decision tree learning. A total of 848 cases officially declared as eradication attempts were documented in our database (8-fold higher than previous reports). Both the number of programmes and their rate of success increased sharply over the last two decades. Only less than 10% of the non-native organisms affecting woody plants were targeted for attempted eradication despite the high economic and ecological impacts caused by some species for which no efforts were undertaken. Almost one-third of the officially declared cases of eradication concerned organisms that were still restricted to the material with which they were introduced. For these cases the success rate was 100%. The success rate of established species was only 50% for arthropods and 61% for pathogens. The spatial extent of the outbreak was the factor that most affected the outcome of eradication campaigns. The eradication success decreased abruptly above 100 ha for arthropods and 10 ha for pathogens. Additionally, other variables were shown to influence the outcome of eradication programmes, in particular the type of environment, with the highest eradication success rate found in nurseries and glasshouses, with successful outcomes increasing if quarantine measures were applied and when monitoring included asymptomatic plants. Particular species traits may reduce eradication success: parthenogenetic arthropods, saprotrophic pathogens, wind dispersal, the possibility to remain asymptomatic indefinitely, and the existence of resting spores or stages. In conclusion, small affected areas, quick response, and efficient implementation of quarantine restrictions, together with particular species traits, may allow a high probability of eradication success. Preparedness at the country and European level would allow a larger number of target species to be included in future eradication programmes.
Eradication欧洲针对木本植物非本地害虫和病原体的计划:哪些因素影响其成功或失败?
当一个非本地物种成功地在一个新的栖息地建立起来时,一种可能的反应是试图消灭它。在本研究中,我们分析了欧洲从1945年至今对木本植物的非本地害虫和病原体(PPWP)的根除计划。我们的主要目标是确定影响根除规划成功的因素,加强今后根除PPWP的指导方针。根除运动的数据来自在线数据库、科学文献和灰色文献以及植物保护组织的报告。采用LASSO回归和决策树学习分析影响节肢动物和致病菌根除成功的因素。在我们的数据库中共记录了848例正式宣布为根除尝试的病例(比以前的报告高8倍)。在过去二十年中,方案的数量及其成功率都急剧增加。只有不到10%的影响木本植物的非本土生物被列为试图根除的目标,尽管一些物种造成了很高的经济和生态影响,但没有采取任何措施。在正式宣布的根除病例中,几乎有三分之一涉及的生物体仍然局限于它们引入时所携带的物质。这些病例的成功率为100%。节肢动物和致病菌的成功率分别为50%和61%。暴发的空间范围是对根除运动的结果影响最大的因素。节肢动物和致病菌的根除成功率分别在100公顷和10公顷以上突然下降。此外,其他变量,特别是环境类型,也会影响根除方案的结果,苗圃和温室的根除成功率最高,如果采取检疫措施并监测包括无症状植物,成功的结果会增加。特定的物种特征可能会降低根除成功率:孤雌生殖节肢动物、腐养性病原体、风传播、无限期无症状的可能性以及休眠孢子或阶段的存在。总之,受影响地区小、反应迅速、有效实施检疫限制,再加上特定的物种特征,可使成功根除的可能性很高。国家和欧洲一级的准备工作将使更多的目标物种能够列入未来的根除规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neobiota
Neobiota Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: NeoBiota is a peer-reviewed, open-access, rapid online journal launched to accelerate research on alien species and biological invasions: aquatic and terrestrial, animals, plants, fungi and micro-organisms. The journal NeoBiota is a continuation of the former NEOBIOTA publication series; for volumes 1-8 see http://www.oekosys.tu-berlin.de/menue/neobiota All articles are published immediately upon editorial approval. All published papers can be freely copied, downloaded, printed and distributed at no charge for the reader. Authors are thus encouraged to post the pdf files of published papers on their homepages or elsewhere to expedite distribution. There is no charge for color.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信