Effect of Time, Temperature, and Storage on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Esthetic Restorative Materials

Q3 Dentistry
Madhura Sen, Prashanthi Madhyastha, M. Bangera, S. Natarajan, R. Kotian
{"title":"Effect of Time, Temperature, and Storage on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Esthetic Restorative Materials","authors":"Madhura Sen, Prashanthi Madhyastha, M. Bangera, S. Natarajan, R. Kotian","doi":"10.4103/jofs.jofs_236_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The fluoride-containing restorative materials act as fluoride reservoir and release fluoride into the oral fluids gradually, thereby inhibiting secondary caries and restoration failure. The study can be utilized to develop improved regimes for topical fluoride delivery. The study evaluated and compared the influence of temperature, time, and storage conditions on the fluoride release and recharge of esthetic restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Silorane-based composite, methacrylate-based composite, compomer, and glass ionomer cement (GIC) were investigated for fluoride release and recharge with the fluoride selective ion electrode after immersion in distilled water and artificial saliva at 4°C, 37°C, and 55°C. Comparison between immersion media was performed with student t test, and comparison between materials and time interval (weeks and days) was performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. The assessment of variation over time was assessed with repeated measures ANOVA. P-value was established to be significant at P < 0.05. Results: The highest rerelease was seen with GIC, followed by Dyract AP, Filtek P90, and Z100. Fluoride rerelease was greatest in GIC followed by Dyract AP in artificial saliva when compared to distilled water. Fluoride release was more significant at a higher temperature of 55°C. Also, fluoride recharge was highest at week 3 where the greatest rerelease was seen on day one. Conclusion: Fluoride release and recharge increase with temperature, time interval, and in artificial saliva.","PeriodicalId":16651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"90 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_236_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The fluoride-containing restorative materials act as fluoride reservoir and release fluoride into the oral fluids gradually, thereby inhibiting secondary caries and restoration failure. The study can be utilized to develop improved regimes for topical fluoride delivery. The study evaluated and compared the influence of temperature, time, and storage conditions on the fluoride release and recharge of esthetic restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Silorane-based composite, methacrylate-based composite, compomer, and glass ionomer cement (GIC) were investigated for fluoride release and recharge with the fluoride selective ion electrode after immersion in distilled water and artificial saliva at 4°C, 37°C, and 55°C. Comparison between immersion media was performed with student t test, and comparison between materials and time interval (weeks and days) was performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. The assessment of variation over time was assessed with repeated measures ANOVA. P-value was established to be significant at P < 0.05. Results: The highest rerelease was seen with GIC, followed by Dyract AP, Filtek P90, and Z100. Fluoride rerelease was greatest in GIC followed by Dyract AP in artificial saliva when compared to distilled water. Fluoride release was more significant at a higher temperature of 55°C. Also, fluoride recharge was highest at week 3 where the greatest rerelease was seen on day one. Conclusion: Fluoride release and recharge increase with temperature, time interval, and in artificial saliva.
时间、温度和储存对修复材料氟化物释放和再充的影响
简介:含氟修复材料作为氟化物的储库,逐渐将氟化物释放到口腔液中,从而抑制继发龋和修复失败。该研究可用于开发局部氟递送的改进方案。本研究评估并比较了温度、时间和储存条件对美学修复材料氟化物释放和再充的影响。材料和方法:在4°C、37°C和55°C的蒸馏水和人工唾液中浸泡后,用氟选择离子电极研究了硅烷基复合材料、甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料和复合物以及玻璃离聚物水泥(GIC)的氟释放和再充。浸泡介质之间的比较采用学生t检验,材料和时间间隔(周和天)之间的比较使用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验。通过重复测量方差分析评估随时间变化的评估。P值有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结果:GIC的复发率最高,其次是Dyract AP、Filtek P90和Z100。与蒸馏水相比,人工唾液中的氟化物在GIC中的再释放最大,其次是Dyract AP。在55°C的高温下,氟化物的释放更为显著。此外,氟化物的补充量在第3周最高,在第一天出现最大的再释放。结论:氟的释放和补充随温度、时间间隔和人工唾液中氟的含量增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orofacial Sciences
Journal of Orofacial Sciences Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orofacial Sciences is dedicated to noblest profession of Dentistry, and to the young & blossoming intellects of dentistry, with whom the future of dentistry will be cherished better. The prime aim of this journal is to advance the science and art of dentistry. This journal is an educational tool to encourage and share the acquired knowledge with our peers. It also to improves the standards and quality of therauptic methods. This journal assures you to gain knowledge in recent advances and research activities. The journal publishes original scientific papers with special emphasis on research, unusual case reports, editorial, review articles, book reviews & other relevant information in context of high professional standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信