The influence of mode of delivery on the neurodevelopment of children and adolescents

J. Meireles, H. Machado
{"title":"The influence of mode of delivery on the neurodevelopment of children and adolescents","authors":"J. Meireles, H. Machado","doi":"10.4172/2376-127X.1000378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cesarean section is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the world and its rates have been increasing worldwide over the past decades. Despite being a lifesaving procedure in emergent situations, it can be associated with a range of adverse maternal and childhood health outcomes. To date, there is a lack of consistent studies regarding the association between mode of delivery and a child’s neurodevelopment. Objective: The aim of this review is to highlight the possibility of neurocognitive outcomes during childhood and adolescence being affected by the child’s mode of delivery.Method: Literature review based on studies published between 2005 and 2018, available on PubMed. Results: Regarding uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries most studies found no difference in neurodevelopment according to mode of delivery, apart from nonplanned cesarean, which usually correlates to worse outcomes. In breech presentation, shortterm outcomes of children born vaginally were poorer while long-term neurological outcomes were contradictory. Preterm infants were more commonly associated with adverse neurological outcomes and these varied according to the age at which children were assessed. Considering drug administration during delivery, the long-term neurological effects of children exposed to exogenous oxytocin are not known and transitory neonatal exposure to anaesthetic drugs during delivery probably won’t harmfully influence longterm neurodevelopment. Conclusions: Neurodevelopment is influenced by a vast number of genetic and environmental variables, becoming impracticable to account for all factors that may affect neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, future investigation is necessary to enlighten if neurodevelopment is in fact associated with mode of delivery or if underlying causes are the real influencers. Thus, when considering mode of delivery, every obstetrical case should be individually analysed, maternal and neonatal risks and benefits should be balanced and common beliefs demystified to help mothers make an informed decision and promote their children’s healthy development.","PeriodicalId":87313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pregnancy and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-127X.1000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the world and its rates have been increasing worldwide over the past decades. Despite being a lifesaving procedure in emergent situations, it can be associated with a range of adverse maternal and childhood health outcomes. To date, there is a lack of consistent studies regarding the association between mode of delivery and a child’s neurodevelopment. Objective: The aim of this review is to highlight the possibility of neurocognitive outcomes during childhood and adolescence being affected by the child’s mode of delivery.Method: Literature review based on studies published between 2005 and 2018, available on PubMed. Results: Regarding uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries most studies found no difference in neurodevelopment according to mode of delivery, apart from nonplanned cesarean, which usually correlates to worse outcomes. In breech presentation, shortterm outcomes of children born vaginally were poorer while long-term neurological outcomes were contradictory. Preterm infants were more commonly associated with adverse neurological outcomes and these varied according to the age at which children were assessed. Considering drug administration during delivery, the long-term neurological effects of children exposed to exogenous oxytocin are not known and transitory neonatal exposure to anaesthetic drugs during delivery probably won’t harmfully influence longterm neurodevelopment. Conclusions: Neurodevelopment is influenced by a vast number of genetic and environmental variables, becoming impracticable to account for all factors that may affect neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, future investigation is necessary to enlighten if neurodevelopment is in fact associated with mode of delivery or if underlying causes are the real influencers. Thus, when considering mode of delivery, every obstetrical case should be individually analysed, maternal and neonatal risks and benefits should be balanced and common beliefs demystified to help mothers make an informed decision and promote their children’s healthy development.
分娩方式对儿童青少年神经发育的影响
背景:剖宫产是世界上最常见的外科手术之一,在过去的几十年里,剖宫产的发生率在全球范围内一直在上升。尽管在紧急情况下是一种救命程序,但它可能与一系列不利的孕产妇和儿童健康结果有关。到目前为止,关于分娩方式与儿童神经发育之间的关系,缺乏一致的研究。目的:本综述的目的是强调儿童和青少年时期神经认知结果受儿童分娩方式影响的可能性。方法:基于2005年至2018年间发表的研究的文献综述,可在PubMed上查阅。结果:关于无并发症的妊娠和分娩,大多数研究发现,除了非计划剖宫产外,不同分娩方式的神经发育没有差异,后者通常与更糟糕的结果相关。在臀位表现中,阴道分娩儿童的短期结果较差,而长期神经系统结果则相互矛盾。早产儿更常与不良的神经系统结果相关,这些结果因评估儿童的年龄而异。考虑到分娩期间的药物管理,暴露于外源性催产素的儿童的长期神经影响尚不清楚,新生儿在分娩期间短暂暴露于麻醉药物可能不会对长期神经发育产生有害影响。结论:神经发育受到大量遗传和环境变量的影响,无法解释可能影响神经认知结果的所有因素。因此,未来的研究是必要的,以了解神经发育是否真的与分娩方式有关,或者潜在的原因是否是真正的影响因素。因此,在考虑分娩方式时,应单独分析每一个产科病例,平衡孕产妇和新生儿的风险和益处,并解开共同信念的神秘面纱,以帮助母亲做出明智的决定,促进孩子的健康发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信