Learning to Work Together

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Chad Stecher, Jonathan D. Ketcham
{"title":"Learning to Work Together","authors":"Chad Stecher, Jonathan D. Ketcham","doi":"10.1086/722605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study whether teams’ productivity improves as they gain experience working together. We leverage unique clinical data to observe team experience and individual physician and staff experience in coronary catheterization laboratories. Teams are composed of cardiologists, nurses, and technicians who work together synchronistically. We observe teams and individuals at hospitals across the United States from 2001 to 2009, including the rate at which they gain experience using drug-eluting stents (DES) from their introduction in the US in 2003 onward. We estimate models of productivity and clinical outcomes that account for team experience, physician experience, and staff experience conditional on each other and on time-invariant physician and staff characteristics, hospital-specific monthly effects, and an extensive set of patient-level clinical factors. Greater experience performing DES cases together improves teams’ productivity, lowering total case time, procedure time, and non-physician labor costs while leaving clinical outcomes unchanged. In contrast, physicians’ and staffs’ individual experience with DES does not improve productivity conditional on other factors. The effects of team experience with DES appears generalized, with gains from experience with competitor brands of DES about as large as those from the specific brand of DES being used for a given case.","PeriodicalId":45056,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":"231 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We study whether teams’ productivity improves as they gain experience working together. We leverage unique clinical data to observe team experience and individual physician and staff experience in coronary catheterization laboratories. Teams are composed of cardiologists, nurses, and technicians who work together synchronistically. We observe teams and individuals at hospitals across the United States from 2001 to 2009, including the rate at which they gain experience using drug-eluting stents (DES) from their introduction in the US in 2003 onward. We estimate models of productivity and clinical outcomes that account for team experience, physician experience, and staff experience conditional on each other and on time-invariant physician and staff characteristics, hospital-specific monthly effects, and an extensive set of patient-level clinical factors. Greater experience performing DES cases together improves teams’ productivity, lowering total case time, procedure time, and non-physician labor costs while leaving clinical outcomes unchanged. In contrast, physicians’ and staffs’ individual experience with DES does not improve productivity conditional on other factors. The effects of team experience with DES appears generalized, with gains from experience with competitor brands of DES about as large as those from the specific brand of DES being used for a given case.
学会一起工作
我们研究团队的工作效率是否会随着团队合作经验的积累而提高。我们利用独特的临床数据来观察团队经验和个人医生和工作人员在冠状动脉导管实验室的经验。团队由心脏病专家、护士和技术人员组成,他们协同工作。从2001年到2009年,我们观察了美国各地医院的团队和个人,包括他们从2003年药物洗脱支架(DES)引入美国以来获得使用经验的比率。我们估计了考虑团队经验、医生经验和员工经验的生产力和临床结果模型,这些模型相互依赖,并取决于医生和员工的时变特征、医院特定的月度影响以及一系列广泛的患者层面的临床因素。一起执行DES病例的更多经验提高了团队的工作效率,降低了总病例时间、手术时间和非医生劳动力成本,同时保持临床结果不变。相比之下,医生和员工对DES的个人经验并没有提高生产力,这取决于其他因素。团队经验对DES的影响似乎是普遍的,从竞争对手品牌的DES经验中获得的收益与从特定品牌的DES中获得的收益大致相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health Economics (AJHE) provides a forum for the in-depth analysis of health care markets and individual health behaviors. The articles appearing in AJHE are authored by scholars from universities, private research organizations, government, and industry. Subjects of interest include competition among private insurers, hospitals, and physicians; impacts of public insurance programs, including the Affordable Care Act; pharmaceutical innovation and regulation; medical device supply; the rise of obesity and its consequences; the influence and growth of aging populations; and much more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信