Praetorius Versus Zarlino: The Question of Modes

Q4 Arts and Humanities

De Musica Disserenda Pub Date : 2019-10-30 DOI:10.3986/dmd15.1-2.05

Nejc Sukljan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with the question of modes as it is discussed in Gioseffo Zarlino’s Istitutioni harmoniche and Michael Praetorius’s Syntagma musicum. First, Gioseffo Zarlino’s adoption of Heinrich Glarean’s system of twelve modes is presented, along with the changes he introduced. Gioseffo Zarlino’s system is then compared to that of Michael Praetorius.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Praetorius vs Zarlino:模式问题

本文讨论了扎里诺的《宪法》和声和迈克尔·普拉托留的《宪法音乐》中所讨论的模式问题。首先，介绍了Zarlino对Heinrich Glasean的十二种模式体系的采用，以及他所引入的变化。然后将乔塞福·扎里诺的体系与迈克尔·普拉托里乌斯的体系进行比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

De Musica Disserenda Arts and Humanities-Music

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： De musica disserenda is an international journal of musical scholarship. It is published by the Institute of Musicology ZRC SAZU (Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts) at the ZRC Publishing (Založba ZRC). The journal is publishing musicological as well as interdisciplinary articles regarding music, with a special attention given to the texts on history of music on the territory of today’s Slovenia in wider European context. Individual issues of the journal with various dissertations are published twice a year, while thematic double issues are published at the end an individual year. The articles are published in Slovenian, English, German, French or Italian languages, with keywords and abstracts in English and Slovenian. A longer summary in Slovenian or English is given at the end of each article.