The Urgency of Agrarian Reform Policy: A Study of the Impact of Land Access on Farmer Household Welfare

Heru Poppy Samosir, J. P. Moeis
{"title":"The Urgency of Agrarian Reform Policy: A Study of the Impact of Land Access on Farmer Household Welfare","authors":"Heru Poppy Samosir, J. P. Moeis","doi":"10.31292/bhumi.v8i2.544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Inequality of land ownership is caused by unequal access to land. This study examined the impact of land access on total farmer's household expenditure. The Agrarian reform policy assumed open and expand access to land for groups of landless or near landless farmer households. Through state-led and market-led approaches, this research provided a categorization of access to land in two ways, which are access opening and access expansion variables with each sample coverage. Using the two periods difference-in-difference (DID) method, this study analyzed the impact of opening and expanding access to the total expenditure of farmer households using IFLS 2007 and 2014 data. The results showed that there is a significant difference in the total expenditures of farmer households due to the opening and expansion of access referring to the land distribution scheme (state-led approach), and there is no significant difference through the market-led approach. Therefore, agrarian reform policies need to be carried out by emphasizing the role of the state in implementing land redistribution to landless and small farmers.\n \nKeywords: Agrarian reform, state-led approach, market-led approach, impact of land access, total farmer household expenditure","PeriodicalId":32710,"journal":{"name":"BHUMI Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BHUMI Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v8i2.544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Inequality of land ownership is caused by unequal access to land. This study examined the impact of land access on total farmer's household expenditure. The Agrarian reform policy assumed open and expand access to land for groups of landless or near landless farmer households. Through state-led and market-led approaches, this research provided a categorization of access to land in two ways, which are access opening and access expansion variables with each sample coverage. Using the two periods difference-in-difference (DID) method, this study analyzed the impact of opening and expanding access to the total expenditure of farmer households using IFLS 2007 and 2014 data. The results showed that there is a significant difference in the total expenditures of farmer households due to the opening and expansion of access referring to the land distribution scheme (state-led approach), and there is no significant difference through the market-led approach. Therefore, agrarian reform policies need to be carried out by emphasizing the role of the state in implementing land redistribution to landless and small farmers.   Keywords: Agrarian reform, state-led approach, market-led approach, impact of land access, total farmer household expenditure
土地改革政策的紧迫性:土地使用权对农户福利的影响研究
摘要:土地所有权的不平等是由于获得土地的不平等造成的。本研究考察了土地使用对农民家庭总支出的影响。土地改革政策假定为无地或接近无地的农户群体开放和扩大获得土地的机会。通过国家主导和市场主导的方法,本研究以两种方式对土地使用权进行了分类,即每个样本覆盖范围内的使用权开放和使用权扩展变量。本研究采用两个时期的差异(DID)方法,利用IFLS 2007年和2014年的数据分析了开放和扩大准入对农户总支出的影响。结果表明,参照土地分配方案(国家主导的方法),由于开放和扩大准入,农户的总支出存在显著差异,而通过市场主导的方法没有显著差异。因此,土地改革政策需要通过强调国家在向无地和小农户实施土地再分配方面的作用来实施。关键词:土地改革、国家主导、市场主导、土地利用影响、农户总支出
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信