{"title":"Does Preoperative Vascular Mapping Using Color-Doppler Ultrasound have a Role in the Success of Axial Nasolabial Flap?","authors":"Anjali Verma, Sujata Mohanty, Pankaj Sharma, Anjali Prakash, Rudra Deo Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12663-023-01954-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study was performed to compare the effects of preoperative vascular mapping on the clinical outcome of axial nasolabial flap.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 26 patients (29 flaps) were alternately divided into two groups using simple block randomization method. In Group I patients, the conventional axial flap was marked. In Group II, USG-guided flap was designed with the help of Color-Doppler ultrasound. Patients were assessed for a minimum of 6 months and the postoperative flap outcome was quantified using a self-validated composite scoring system. Other parameters of patient morbidity including length of hospital stay, resurgery for reconstruction of secondary defects, postoperative complications were also measured and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean postoperative flap outcome score was significantly superior in Group II patients than Group I, at the beginning and at the conclusion of the study (intergroup <i>p</i>-value at postoperative-1-week = .001; at postoperative-1-month = .044; at postoperative-3-month = .139; at postoperative-6-month = .007). Additionally, reconstruction defects with the conventional nasolabial flap were associated with greater morbidity as compared to Group II (intergroup comparison-hospital stay and duration <i>p</i> = .001; complications <i>p</i> = .115; Redo Surgery <i>p</i> = .096).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Therefore, it can be concluded that flap selection based on known dominant perforators could be helpful in achieving favorable outcomes resulting in minimal postoperative morbidity while allowing complex surgical reconstructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"224-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01954-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The study was performed to compare the effects of preoperative vascular mapping on the clinical outcome of axial nasolabial flap.
Materials and methods: A total of 26 patients (29 flaps) were alternately divided into two groups using simple block randomization method. In Group I patients, the conventional axial flap was marked. In Group II, USG-guided flap was designed with the help of Color-Doppler ultrasound. Patients were assessed for a minimum of 6 months and the postoperative flap outcome was quantified using a self-validated composite scoring system. Other parameters of patient morbidity including length of hospital stay, resurgery for reconstruction of secondary defects, postoperative complications were also measured and compared.
Results: The mean postoperative flap outcome score was significantly superior in Group II patients than Group I, at the beginning and at the conclusion of the study (intergroup p-value at postoperative-1-week = .001; at postoperative-1-month = .044; at postoperative-3-month = .139; at postoperative-6-month = .007). Additionally, reconstruction defects with the conventional nasolabial flap were associated with greater morbidity as compared to Group II (intergroup comparison-hospital stay and duration p = .001; complications p = .115; Redo Surgery p = .096).
Conclusion: Therefore, it can be concluded that flap selection based on known dominant perforators could be helpful in achieving favorable outcomes resulting in minimal postoperative morbidity while allowing complex surgical reconstructions.
期刊介绍:
This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.