The Competent Child: valuing all young children as knowledgeable commentators on their own lives

A. Clark, R. Flewitt
{"title":"The Competent Child: valuing all young children as knowledgeable commentators on their own lives","authors":"A. Clark, R. Flewitt","doi":"10.26220/REV.3369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we discuss the concept of ‘competency’ and ‘the competent child’ in relation to young children, particularly those who may be considered ‘less competent’ than others, whether through disability, ethnicity or socio-economic background. We critique normative discourses of ‘competency’ and consider how assumptions about competency in early childhood education can support or hinder young children’s learning. We ask how competent are we, as researchers and educators, in recognising and valuing young children’s perspectives? We ground our argument in brief accounts of findings from two UK-based early childhood research studies which were both founded on the principle that all young children are knowledgeable commentators on their own lives. The first example is taken from a small-scale study exploring the learning experiences of four-year-old children with special educational needs who attended both ‘special’ and ‘mainstream’ early education settings. The second example draws on a longitudinal study with young children aged three to eight years in the re-design of their early childhood education environment. We critique normative conceptualisations of competency and the competent child, and we adopt a socio-material perspective to disentangle how perceptions of competence configure the relationship between competency, participation and pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":30116,"journal":{"name":"Review of Science Mathematics and ICT Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Science Mathematics and ICT Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26220/REV.3369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the concept of ‘competency’ and ‘the competent child’ in relation to young children, particularly those who may be considered ‘less competent’ than others, whether through disability, ethnicity or socio-economic background. We critique normative discourses of ‘competency’ and consider how assumptions about competency in early childhood education can support or hinder young children’s learning. We ask how competent are we, as researchers and educators, in recognising and valuing young children’s perspectives? We ground our argument in brief accounts of findings from two UK-based early childhood research studies which were both founded on the principle that all young children are knowledgeable commentators on their own lives. The first example is taken from a small-scale study exploring the learning experiences of four-year-old children with special educational needs who attended both ‘special’ and ‘mainstream’ early education settings. The second example draws on a longitudinal study with young children aged three to eight years in the re-design of their early childhood education environment. We critique normative conceptualisations of competency and the competent child, and we adopt a socio-material perspective to disentangle how perceptions of competence configure the relationship between competency, participation and pedagogy.
称职的孩子:重视所有年幼的孩子,将他们视为对自己生活有见识的评论员
在本文中,我们讨论了与幼儿有关的“能力”和“有能力的孩子”的概念,特别是那些可能因残疾、种族或社会经济背景而被认为比其他人“能力差”的孩子。我们批判“能力”的规范性话语,并考虑早期儿童教育中关于能力的假设如何支持或阻碍幼儿的学习。我们要问,作为研究人员和教育工作者,我们在认识和重视幼儿观点方面的能力有多大?我们的论点基于两项英国早期儿童研究的发现,这两项研究都建立在所有幼儿都是自己生活的知识评论员的原则之上。第一个例子来自一项小型研究,该研究探索了在“特殊”和“主流”早期教育环境中接受过特殊教育需求的四岁儿童的学习经验。第二个例子是对三到八岁的幼儿进行纵向研究,重新设计他们的幼儿教育环境。我们批判能力和有能力的孩子的规范性概念,我们采用社会-物质的角度来理清能力的感知如何配置能力,参与和教学之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信