Post-COVID recovery and renewal through whole-of-society resilience in cities

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andrew G. McClelland , Roisin Jordan , Szymon Parzniewski , Duncan Shaw , Nat O'Grady , David Powell
{"title":"Post-COVID recovery and renewal through whole-of-society resilience in cities","authors":"Andrew G. McClelland ,&nbsp;Roisin Jordan ,&nbsp;Szymon Parzniewski ,&nbsp;Duncan Shaw ,&nbsp;Nat O'Grady ,&nbsp;David Powell","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores and extends understanding of the role and significance of whole-of-society resilience programmes that support cities when dealing with complex crises, like the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlighting the complexity of whole-of-society resilience as different actors locally shape it, we ask the question: How can collaboration between formal and informal resilience practices help to enhance resilience across the ‘whole-of-society’? We answer this question by reviewing the importance of whole-of-society resilience and its complexity in a city’s governance of the COVID-19 crisis. We argue that the necessity of renewing approaches to building local resilience capabilities across the whole-of-society requires synchronisation across and between formal and informal approaches – that is, “bottom-up” and governmental initiatives – to meet the diverse needs of communities. Secondly, we detail two recent practice-orientated initiatives that have taken a renewal approach to building resilience through the involvement of whole-of-society in planning recovery from COVID-19 using international standard ISO/TS 22393; and a new initiative called the National Consortium for Societal Resilience [UK+]. Finally, we signpost a set of critical questions for whole-of-society resilience practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000184/pdfft?md5=20f9a921ae6a681c564597863b91bc17&pid=1-s2.0-S2666449622000184-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper explores and extends understanding of the role and significance of whole-of-society resilience programmes that support cities when dealing with complex crises, like the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlighting the complexity of whole-of-society resilience as different actors locally shape it, we ask the question: How can collaboration between formal and informal resilience practices help to enhance resilience across the ‘whole-of-society’? We answer this question by reviewing the importance of whole-of-society resilience and its complexity in a city’s governance of the COVID-19 crisis. We argue that the necessity of renewing approaches to building local resilience capabilities across the whole-of-society requires synchronisation across and between formal and informal approaches – that is, “bottom-up” and governmental initiatives – to meet the diverse needs of communities. Secondly, we detail two recent practice-orientated initiatives that have taken a renewal approach to building resilience through the involvement of whole-of-society in planning recovery from COVID-19 using international standard ISO/TS 22393; and a new initiative called the National Consortium for Societal Resilience [UK+]. Finally, we signpost a set of critical questions for whole-of-society resilience practice.

通过城市的全社会复原力实现新冠肺炎疫情后的复苏和复兴
本文探讨并扩展了对全社会复原力规划的作用和意义的理解,这些规划支持城市应对COVID-19大流行等复杂危机。我们强调了全社会复原力的复杂性,因为不同的行动者在当地塑造了复原力,我们提出了这样一个问题:正式和非正式复原力实践之间的合作如何有助于增强整个“全社会”的复原力?我们通过回顾全社会复原力的重要性及其在城市治理COVID-19危机中的复杂性来回答这个问题。我们认为,必须更新在全社会范围内建立地方恢复能力的方法,这需要在正式和非正式方法之间进行同步,即“自下而上”和政府倡议,以满足社区的多样化需求。其次,我们详细介绍了最近两项以实践为导向的举措,这些举措采用了一种全新的方法,通过全社会参与规划2019冠状病毒病后的恢复工作,采用国际标准ISO/TS 22393;以及一项名为“国家社会复原力联盟”的新倡议。最后,我们为全社会弹性实践提出了一系列关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信